I like to travel. I have seen most of the United States (except for New England, West Virginia, Alaska and Hawaii) I went to Mexico as a kid and also Grand Cayman as a child.
In Asia, I have been to South Korea, Taiwan, China, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Thailand. I also recently came back from Hong Kong.
I was thinking about where I would like to go if I had the time or money, and what places would be dangerous to go into, and what places would I feel more comfortable either in a tour or having someone who is native to that country. I like to call it Go, go with Others, or Not Go, because of the dangers involved. Also, a place with a good understanding of the English language.
GO:
Basically every country in Europe with the possible exception of Albania and maybe parts of the former Yugoslavia. I think even Yugoslavia is safe now. Romania and Bulgaria I would also probably do as a tour and not self travel. Russia I would love to see. I want to take the Trans Siberian railway from Beijing to Moscow, see Moscow and then go back. I think as long as I have money and not get into trouble, the rest of Europe is safe as it gets.
**Africa **would be mostly NOT GO with some countries that would fall under Go with Others. Egypt would be a Go with Others type of country. Actually Egypt would rock if you knew a local Eqyptian to take you around. Morrocco and Tunisia would also be interesting places where I would feel safe. Algeria is a dangerous country from what I hear. I saw the Michael Palin series Sahara and really enjoyed that and would love to take that trip if I was rich like Michael Palin. But he had a film crew and security. Don’t know how safe an independent traveler would be driving in the middle of Mali seeking a lost tribe.
NO GO places would be The Sudan, Central African Republic, Rwanda, Burundi, Zimbabwe, Somolia, Liberia, Guinea, Nigeria, just basically almost every African country, especially those that ring the Atlantic coast. Madagascar would be an interesting place to see however. Eithiopia would be fascinating, but how safe is Eithiopia?
Middle East
Go: Abu Dhabi, Bahrain, UAE, Dubai, Oman, Kuwait, Qatar, Turkey. (Turkey would probably be on the boundry of Go/Go with others, I would “Go with others” if we went to the eastern part of the nation.
Go with Others: Saudi Arabia (can’t go to Mecca, deserts bore me, hate camels and oil derricks are very interesting. The lack of alcohol would also be an extreme bummer.) Iran (would love to go there, however, as an American, I would have to take a tour by law. I would feel very safe in Iran.) Syria. Jordan.
Not Go: Israel (I just would not feel safe there.)The Gaza Strip, Iraq (obviously), probably the Caucuses regions.
Asia:
India I would “go with others” if I was travelling to different cities and places inside India. I am kind of torn if I want to go there or not. I do not like Indian food. The poverty, pollution, beggars and overpopulation would be challenging. If I had the money to go there, I would rather go on a group to “learn the ropes” as it were. China has that learning curve too for independent travel. Good thing about India is that most people can speak English.
Sri Lanka is another place that would be a “go with others” place because of the fact that they have recently had a civil war, and the fact that there is a lot of poverty as in other places in the region. Bangladesh would be cool to go see, because Bangladesh is such a cool name. But Bangladesh would be similiar with India with the same problems and the same infastructure.
Khazakstan would be interesting to see, but probably in a tour group. The rest of the -Stan countries would probably be a “no go”. There are some interesting sites in Uzbekistan, but I have read recently from the USA State Department that there is some terrorism/kidnapping stuff going on.
Indonesia would be on the border of “No Go/May Go”. The Phillipines the same way.
No go:
Pakistan (which really sucks because I would love to go there if it wasn’t for the terrorism and problems in that country), Afghanistan (that sucks for the same reason as Pakistan.
I wouldn’t go to North Korea, just because it is North Korea. Ever visited a relative in prison and were happy to get out of there because although you were in the prison, you were in prison. This to me is North Korea. I would not be allowed to explore the country, be fed a bunch of propaganda and lies, and knowing my money is going to tyrants who keep these people hostage. Funk that.
Myanmar (or Burma) for about the same reason as North Korea. I would be more inclined to go to Burma, because at least there are pretty temples to look at and a much more scenic landscape. Like North Korea, it would be nice if they could have a better government.
Would not venture into the -stan countries because of political instability. Kygyzstan, Tajikistan? No thanks.
Go:
Japan (love to go there.), Mongolia!
I would like to go to Australia, but I am not dying to go there. It would be fun to know someone there to stay with. New Zealand would be a beautiful country to see. I would also love to see some Pacific islands like Tahiti and so on. Take a cruise around the islands.
South America:
Go: Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay, Peru, Bolivia, Equador. See the Andes. Bullfighting, Flemeenco dancing. The food would be great. Ochocinco!
May go: Brazil. I think outside of Rio and San Paulo, I wouldn’t feel any danger, but I feel I would be have to be vigilant in the bigger cities. The Amazon would be amazing to see.
No Go: Columbia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana.
In Central America, I would feel safe going to any of those countries. Guetemala and El Salvador I probably would feel less secure in.
I wouldn’t want to travel to Mexico now, however the interior of the country is probably safe.
Canada? What would I do there that I cannot do in the USA? Tim Horton coffee?