You really have to ask yourself what sort of an idiot shoots himself in the foot this badly after his side wins.
Jesus christ, they have the senate majority all he had to do was keep his mouth shut, mumble some words about strom thurman’s lifetime of government service and get drunk.
And you know all of them personally, I suppose? Or have worked for all of them?
I didn’t think so.
As for Lott’s BET interview. I think it would have been better for him if he hadn’t done it. I think my favorite part was when Lott said, “I’ve never felt superior to anyone because of skin color in my life.” The interviewer responded with, “Not even when, as fraternity president, you actively sought to block blacks from joining your fraternity?”
Lott’s answer? “No, not even then.”
I mean, come on. That just makes him look like a liar. He should have come out and said that in his youth he was a racist. But as he began to get out in the real world and had to interact with more and more people of different races, he came to realize that those views were not just wrong, but reprehensible and said that it was something about his past that he is terribly ashamed of. Then he should have stated again that he recognizes that his comments were inappropriate and racially insensitive, and stated again that they in no way reflect his outlook on race. Then announced his push for tripling the funding for inner-city schools in Mississippi.
Still, it’s possible he just didn’t want to single out or otherwise endanger the black staffers he may have.
Besides the Washington office he also has five “field offices” in Mississippi, and I’d be really surprised if he had absolutely no blacks working in any of them. How would he keep the lid on something like that? Sooner or later somebody would notice and would have said something.
So I’m gonna say that he probably does have some African-American staffers somewhere, because for one thing, with these comments being disseminated as widely as they are, and with so many hungry journalists on the prowl, if the fact was that he really didn’t have any black staffers, somebody somewhere would have raised their hand by now and said, “Um…”
Of course even if Lott resigns and Musgrove appoints a Democrat to replace him (Jean Carnahan, up for a move to Mississippi?) the Republicans by din’t of holding the vice-presidency will still control the Senate, as Dick Cheney will cast any tie-breaking votes. At least if that happens, though, we’ll know where Dickie is on a day-to-day basis, unless the entire Senate plans on moving to a “secure, undisclosed location.”
Gee… no one seems to be squawking about the root source of all this trouble: the guy Lott was praising when he stepped in the baaad stuff, one Strom Thurmond.
Thurmond is about as racist as they come and still hold political office. How come no one’s squawking about HIS voting record?
Not that I’m wild about Lott’s either, but if we’re going to clean all the poisonous evil scum out of Congress, why think small?
Well, Thurmond is retiring (finally), and just celebrated his 100th birthday. We don’t expect that he will be with us much longer. It has also been said that Thurmond has recanted the views he held in 1948, and Thurmond did vote for extending the Voting Rights Act and for the King holiday, both of which Lott opposed. So, the reason no one is squawking about Thurmond is that he’s not going to be in public life anymore, and is not expected to be in this life much longer.
Thurmond is also not the incoming majority leader.
Rank and file Republicans I know have long been disgusted with the party’s coddling of the far right wing, to the extent that several of them are now former Republicans.
The best thing the Republican party could do is to loudly denounce this shit-stain without giving his whiny-ass threats to step down any consideration at all. With the VP, even a 50-50 split still goes in their favor- and come next election I know several former Republicans that could be enticed back if the party would just take a hard line with the racist assholes within their ranks.
Unfortunately, it’s unlikely to happen because the racists, gun lovers, and fundamentalists also tend to be the ones who go out to vote. If Karl Rove took one lesson from nearly losing the election in 2000, it is that turnout is key. If pandering to the racists means that more GOP voters turn out than Democratic voters, then pandering will occur.
If Lott is going to learn anything from this, it is that apologizing is not going to help any more.
Those who are after him are doing so because they see a chance to pick up a Democratic seat in the Senate. They are not going to listen to any apologies, and nothing will satisfy them except his ouster.
Lott is going down the wrong path. He should stop apologizing, stop trying to combat any of this, and respond to all press questions on the subject with, “I have already apologized for my comments, which were wrong. I don’t support segregation in any way, shape, or form.” And keep repeating this, using the same words, until the press gets tired of baiting him.
This is no longer about race relations, and Lott is fooling himself if he thinks the press is interested in better relations between the races in America. This is pure power politics. The press wants control of the Senate back in Democratic hands. This is payback for the Republicans winning the elections.