Has anyone confirmed that this booklet actually existed as claimed?
Because there’s a possibility that the correct answer to the OP is…
H) Somebody at a right-wing blog has a photoshop program.
Although I suppose that would fall under F.
It sounds like it did. What the … !!!, please explain to me why you think the news media should show even less discernment in evaluating what’s true and what isn’t- in this case treating something that is obviously an error as a valuable document. Tell me why, for example, the literary agent would be telling the truth (and Obama would sign off on it) even though it contradicts the text of his book (not to mention his actual birth certificate) and would reveal something he supposedly doesn’t want people to know.
AL)-Ghol says “I don’t care HOW prepared Batman gets. He’ll never be ready for this thread!”
AM) Ya gotta get up pretty early in the morning to fake your own birth records and fool the whole world!
It’s all adding up then. Kenya is thirteen time zones ahead of Hawaii. Obama would have had plenty of time to fake his birth certificate and get a full night of sleep before being born the next morning.
OK. Pretend for a moment that I’m a big idiot who doesn’t follow the news in the United States. Give me your argument for why this pamphlet is newsworthy, and what exactly the news should be reporting about it.
Something like, “This is Dan Rather.” (Note that I’m so out of it that I still think Dan Rather is lead anchor for CBS News) “Our top story tonight, 17 years ago a marketing company put out a promotional flyer for then-community organizer Barack Obama’s book “Dreams of My Father”. The flyer incorrectly stated that Obama was born in Kenya, when he was actually born in Hawaii, and that Obama’s father was the Kenyan Finance Minister, when he was actually a civil service economist. It also stated that Obama was raised in Hawaii, Indonesia, and Chicago, when in fact he only moved to Chicago as an adult after graduating from Columbia University. We contacted the marketing department of Acton and Dystel, who had no comment.”
Is that the kind of story you would expect an unbiased media would have aired? Or something different?
AL)l our elliptical friend wants is for the media to JAQ the story into yet another revelation of the alien usurper and deceiver’s perfidious not-US-ness.