The original post was:
To get your interpretation you would have to add a bit of explanatory dialog and delete about fifty "ha ha"s.
I’m not even sure how to explain the idea of “interpretation.” Lemme try.
Yeah, obviously the explanatory text wasn’t there. That’s why readers have to interpret the OP’s intention, try to figure out WHY there were so many ha’s. Again, I don’t think it was a stellar post.
But Colibri interpreted it one way, and his interpretation is incorrect.
So yes: to get my interpretation, I did have to add some text explaining my interpretation. That’s how interpretations work.