Edit to the above: With what I know about race cars I think he’s probably right. In car racing, undertrays and diffusers help the car hold to the road better by directing airflow under the car. Though these pieces on trailers are very different and much smaller relative to overall vehicle size, it would very likely have a much smaller, but similar effect.
I guess the deflector I posted is used instead of the side skirts I see installed. The ones running down the side below the trailers box. Maybe both are used but we can’t see them.
No. What happens when you brake hard? Think about it.
When the driver hits the brake, your unrestrained body will slide forward and *then *back down that little slide.
Truck drivers are not generally known for accelerating suddenly when there’s a trailer attached to the truck. But careless car drivers are known for cutting in front of a truck and finding that they have to brake fast. Causing the truck driver to brake fast.
Any gadget that offers a 10% improvement in fuel consumption should be treated with grave suspicion.
I was involved in an assessment of fuel saving devices a few years ago (this wan no one of them) and we found that the most cost-effective thing to do, was to reduce the space (and therefore the turbulence) between the tractor and trailer to the bare minimum. Over her most tractor units have spring loaded wings at the rear sides, to close up the gap as much as they can.
10% is a pretty big gain. It’s worth noting that the manufacturer - SmartTruck - appears NOT to be listed in the EPA’s offical SmartWay program, which lists numerous other manufacturers of MPG-improving hardware for trucks. The fact that they chose “SmartTruck” as a name suggests they are trying to take advantage of potentail confusion by customers.
For reference, some of the aerodynamic items on the SmartWay page offer the following estimated gains in fuel economy:
Trailer gap reducer: 1%
Trailer boat tails: 1%
Trailer side skirts: 4%
Advanced trailer end fairing: 5%
Advanced trailer end fairing: 5%
the 10% improvement claimed for the SmartTruck device seems unlikely.
I also found this page, detailing how the SmartTruck folks utilized Oak Ridge National Lab’s supercomputer for simulating the aerodynamics of the device. Near the bottom of that page, I found this paragraph:
So depending on which components are installed, they seem to be pretty earnest about claiming a large fuel economy improvement. Unlike most car owners, truckers and fleet owners track their fuel expenses pretty rigorously, so if the claimed MPG improvements were bullshit, I would expect them to be found out pretty quickly.
$2600. Let’s say 6mpg. Savings of 5% = 0.09g per mile. Fuel - let’s say $3.5/g. So - you get your money back in about 8300 miles. Feel free to check my calc if I am mistaken.