Celery has so few calories, and the act of chewing and digesting actually burns more calories than the celery contains. Thus, it is said celery is a negative calorie food, but the net loss is small. Don’t go starting some new celery-craze diet, now!
Don’t know about the lipstick composition.
“They’re coming to take me away ha-ha, ho-ho, hee-hee, to the funny farm where life is beautiful all the time… :)” - Napoleon IV
Lipstick with fishscales in? As such, I doubt it. I wouldn’t be surprised, however, to learn that it generally contained some ingredient that is derived from fish. Lots of products contain ingredients derived from animal sources, whether you’d think so or not. Jello and other gelatins are derived from animal bones and hooves (mostly beef, I think). Beer is sometimes made with a coagulant called isinglass (derived from fish guts) which helps the particulates settle out. Shampoo has rendered fats in it, as well as placenta extracts.
And on and on…
A committee is a lifeform with six or more legs and no brain.
It seems one stalk of celery should be sufficient for nearly 3 minites of vigorous sex.
Now time to apply some logic.
Does it take you more than 3 minites to chew a stalk of celery? Is that act of chewing more tiring than vigorous sex? How many calories do you think it takes to pass 1.7g of fiber through your colon?
Conclusion,
Though celery is very low in caloric content it is not an “anti-food”.