Differential Calculus.easy to understand.
Sheesh. Not a troll. Some kind of test I’m supposed to take? Or is disagreeing with you all it takes to be a troll.
What name did you previously post under?
That’s exactly what I mean. Vaguely insulting, but no actual* content. *Nothing to actually respond to. No point, no argument, nothing.
Der_Trihs:
That’s exactly what I mean. Vaguely insulting, but no actual* content. *Nothing to actually respond to. No point, no argument, nothing.
And like I was trying to say, it’s a lot like what I’ve seen out of you.
Only with a little less vitriol and hate.
HeweyLogan:
And like I was trying to say, it’s a lot like what I’ve seen out of you.
Only with a little less vitriol and hate.
And again; no actual argument or point, just vague insults. You don’t have anything to say.
RickJay
October 4, 2016, 8:13pm
108
raventhief:
The weird thing is that some of the stuff he does - you would expect that to anger his base. Like attacking a gold star family, and saying that your success is a sacrifice like theirs. Or saying that he never asks God for forgiveness, because he doesn’t do anything to merit forgiveness.
I would expect his base to bristle at least some of what he says. But they just don’t.
Trump’s attack on the Khan family dropped him four points in the polls in about three days, which is one hell of a quick hit. If he wanted to lose the election, he just would have kept doing the same thing, and he’d be below Gary Johnson by now.
RickJay:
Trump’s attack on the Khan family dropped him four points in the polls in about three days, which is one hell of a quick hit. If he wanted to lose the election, he just would have kept doing the same thing, and he’d be below Gary Johnson by now.
Yeah, blowing Gary Johnson might do it, if done on stage during one of his rallies.
But still Donald’s voter base would think nothing of him fellating Gary “I Left My Heart in Aleppo” Johnson at a rally, or if GJ had been allowed to this upcoming town hall debate - maybe there…in front of a serenely smiling Hillary.
(Just wanted to make sure we’re staying on OP topic here.)
I don’t think she’s into blowjobs.
Everybody’s into blowjobs.
Shodan
October 13, 2016, 4:15pm
113
Actually back in the 90s it seemed Hillary was the only woman in DC who wasn’t.
Regards,
President Trump’s First Term | The New Yorker
Technically a post-election topic, so mods - relocate this to wherever. I haven’t read every Hillary/Donald thread, so it’s possible this link has appeared elsewhere, but definitely not as a thesis statement to form a thread around.
When I first came across it I thought ok - what kind of speculation-fest is this gonna be? The article is a real bum-dinger (bummer), that, to its credit, used many sources, thus ameliorating my concern about this turning out to be a writer’s contemplation.
Apart from these mere scraps of consolation:
“Some of Trump’s promises would be impossible to fulfill without the consent of Congress or the courts; namely, repealing Obamacare, cutting taxes, and opening up “our libel laws” that protect reporters, so that “we can sue them and win lots of money.” (In reality, there are no federal libel laws.) Even if Republicans retain control of Congress, they are unlikely to have the sixty votes in the Senate required to overcome a Democratic filibuster .”
Nitpick: actually, the most important libel law is federal: the First Amendment. Defamation claims are almost always governed by state law, but the law that Trump is actually complaining about - that is, the one that requires him to prove “actual malice” when suing a reporter for defamation - is the First Amendment.