It’s racist to disapprove of interracial marriage, and it’s racist to believe it should be illegal. Now, private racist beliefs are different (and less harmful) than advocacy for racist laws, but they’re both racist beliefs.
However, I should have noted the difference in the polling question, and thank you for pointing that out.
Trump is looking into paying the legal fees for Uncle Cleetus and his sucker punch. Will only embolden his supporters. What a fucking piece of trash.
Not everyone looks at the world through some race or class warfare lens. I look at the world through a suckers who trust the government and those who don’t warfare lens.
You have no right to protest on private or reserved property.
People were protesting in public streets. Trump wet his shorts in fear.
It’s that what you consider a sign of a healthy democracy, when your political opponents are scared to assemble with their supporters?
No, but it is hypocritical for Trump to complain when at the same time he plans to pay for a legal defense for a supporter who clocked someone.
I’m just waiting for the teabaggers to go full insurgency. And be put down accordingly. There’s evidence they are trending that way.
Turns out Sanders supporters did do it, although the Sanders campaign wasn’t behind it. This shouldn’t be too surprising, given that Sanders and Trump supporters overlap a bit.
I notice how you only talk about race and class warfare when people are noticing how certain rich people are benefiting unjustly, and how certain white people are racist shitheads.
Nice job trying to make this a pro-government/anti-government thing, by the way; that distraction has done yeoman work in the past, but I think you’ll find it falls a bit flat here.
The GOP: We Aren’t Racist Because… Hey, Look Over There! Socialism!
You are telling me how I think. I think I know my own mind better.
You are completely failing to refute any of my arguments.
You aren’t making any sense. You are telling me what I think. How can I refute the “arguments” of one so arrogant? I said “rabble”. You turned that into race baiting. If you ever saw a left wing protest you’d see rabble doesn’t imply monolithic race. It’d imply jobless, smelly people who want more of what other people earn.
(Emphasis mine.)
Really, anything I could add here would be superfluous.
I know this is going back a little bit, but I disagree with this point.
It’s easy to say up until now that Trump has been regarded as a clown talking nonsense, but he’s been winning primaries. And 40% support is as close as anyone is likely to get to an endorsement in a divided field.
But now, with these clashes, I really think this is something that could hurt him. To what degree he’s culpable (which is a large degree IMO) is largely irrelevant: it’s a preview of what the country might start to look like under his leadership, and I think a lot of conservatives may recoil from that.
(And yeah I’m using somewhat guarded language because we’re already in unknown territory…)
I’m thinking the supporters of the candidate who openly said that if elected he’d change to law to allow him to go after anyone criticizing himare probably currently winning the “more fascist than thou” competition.
Well, not quite, – actually, that damage was caused by some vigorous rolling going on under the gravestones.
It doesn’t suprise me one bit that Trump would rather have libel laws that looked like Britain’s so he could sue people that lied about him. This is yet another thing I disagree with him on.
Anyway…I don’t suppose you have heard Bernie ranting to his supporters about how the Koch brothers are too influential and promising to take care of them when he is president…
And of course his supporters are already organizing to try to shut down the political speech of their opponents…
So, um, yeah…
BREAKING: Christian Pastor Loves Jesus and Thinks You Should Too, Tune in at 11:00 to find out how to protect yourself.