You are really an ignorant here, the situation is that the courts already rendered the verdict after years of investigations.
Arpaio is now in court as we are speaking to fight the new charges that he is in contempt of court for doing racial profiling.
Again, that is what Trump sees and loves, I already gave up months ago the idea that Trump is just an ignorant, he does know from whom to get comfort and aid with his run to the presidency.
And since it is so uncommon, why did Trump joined Arpaio to the hip after the republican senators from Arizona told him to avoid Arpaio? The reality is that they, like anyone that does look at the news, knows about the legal and ethical issues with Arpaio, as the local newspaper can tell you Arpaio is “a bully with a badge” and remains a shame for Arizona and the USA for that matter. That Trump decided that that kind of authoritarian and above the law guy was/is kosher for him is what demonstrates who Trump really is.
Usually guilt by association is not a good point to make, when the association is a casual one, not so when the associates are so willing to join forces and Trump just ignores how guilty the ones he is cuddling with are.
Errm what does that have to do with my post about the ‘insufficient funds’ thing being floated by a Trump surrogate? My questions were directed at that.
Keywords: Trump surrogate, giving an interview to CNN. Making bullshit excuses for Trump. And I’d wager the campaign knows about her (and the fantasy spin), since she’s a relative regular as a surrogate.
The chairman of the Colorado GOP has said he’s leaving his wife at home and taking a Sheriff with him when he goes to the convention in Cleveland, because he’s getting so many death threats because of Cruz taking all of the state’s delegates.
Bernie Bros have been far more willing to use or suggest force in response to political messages they disagree with, out in the real world, and right here in this thread. The incidents just aren’t played on each news cycle loop for three days like every scuffle at a Trump rally is.
None of this refutes my point that Arpaio is a symbol, primarily, of anti-illegal immigrant sentiment, for which racism is not a prerequisite. A decision that racial profiling is acceptable can be the result of any combination of pragmatism and indifferent to racial justice issues.
No, only those wearing Trump-colored glasses did. His action was clearly within the definition of battery under the law.
You do realize that prosecutors decide not to go to trial for other reasons than not having evidence? For instance the likely arguments that a high-powered lawyer (paid for by Trump) could make to get Lewandowski off?
Or maybe you don’t, or just won’t acknowledge it. Changes nothing. Sue, Michelle. Sue.
It did not work for Arpaio, so yes I already know what you are saying about being a symbol, it also does not deny that Trump is adopting that symbol and what it means. Back in reality Arpaio only demonstrates the kind of “law and order” Trump wants to see for all America.
Nah, implied consent to being touched is given when one enters a crowd. And he also has a good case that he was protecting Trump, who can be seen pulling away from Michelle as she touched him.
If she ever even got close to a mosh pit she would probably accuse the whole crowd of assaulting her.