No that would be Biden and Harris along with other lower polling hawks.
It isn’t slander if it is true. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?
Biden is polling low? What polls do you have that put Gabbard over Biden?
I’m sure he meant “Biden, Harris and other hawks (who are polling lower than Biden and Harris)”
Do I have evidence she isn’t weird, odd, or scary?
Is that the question I asked? :rolleyes:
Yes. That’s how she is being slandered.
I don’t know why you keep pushing this candidate…but I do know why the Republican Party wants her to be a front runner. She carries so much baggage her nickname might as well be “Samsonite”, and the bad PR about her would practically guarantee a second Trump term.
What in the article referenced in the OP is slander, in your opinion?
“Tulsi Gabbard Had a Very Strange Childhood”
Ooh scary weird brown person wants to stop wars…
Is this the extent of the slander in the article, in your opinion?
Yes unlike other candidates who have supported every war and incarceration she has “baggage” because of your blatant religious bigotry. Curious that religion is baggage while hawkishness and Puritanism is not.
Supersizing a single word and artificially inserting a racism accusation? I don’t know where you are getting your craptastic bullet points, but you might want to find another source.
The whole thing was slander, the headline of the article was pure bigotry, but of course that is how US media deals with antiwar candidates.
Aside from “strange”, what in the article was slander? It appeared to me to be mostly factual reporting.
Care to get specific as to what was inaccurate in the article…or are you going to stick with the vague accusations?
This poster is very fond of using the term “slanderous” to describe many Americans’ criticisms of Gabbard. As s/he uses it, the sense of the word seems to be “people don’t like her and I think they should.” Unfortunately, I doubt you will get much further edification asking questions about what Actual Slander has taken place.
Gabbard has literally described herself as a hawk, and she’s the only Democratic candidate who has done so. She has stated multiple times that we should significantly step up our military efforts against Muslims, when all of the other Democrats are looking for ways to make peace.
From the Medium link earlier up above:
“I hope one day Tulsi does reject Chris and finds her own voice.”
So, she’s a Chrisian then?
Isn’t Tulsi Gabbard the “anti-war pacifist” that took off two weeks from the campaign for National Guard duty? I know her name gets lots of play on Fox News, and she had a pleasant interview with Tucker Carlson…and if Tucker Carlson gives you a pleasant interview you might want to rethink your value system.