TV psychics and cold reading

Er, um, no offence, but this isn’t right either! Every hyperlink on my site is a different colour than the main text. All main text is plain black. Every hyperlink is a customised blue colour. I’m not sure what the problem is… maybe something to do with the way your monitor is set up?

You can’t build a website that pleases everyone, but if enough people tell me the hyperlinks aren’t showing up clearly, I guess I’ll just change the colour of them. But JZ is, so far, the first and only person to point this out.

And my thanks to JZ for his gracious reply viz. the security issue. I hope that we have managed to clarify the point, and in any case it really IS explained in detail on my site.

Love to you all, and to those of you who actually ordered the book - you are all very special and wonderful people and I’d buy you all some Koo Koo Roo chicken if I could afford to.

Ian, I went back and looked again, scrolling over all of the pages. I’m viewing it with a Relisys 19” monitor and I don’t know of any problems with it, but maybe the colors need adjusting on my monitor since nobody else has mentioned it to you. If some of those hyperlinks are a customized blue color, I honestly cannot distinguish it from the black type when the background appears to be the same color as the hyperlinks, which was why I was taking my mouse and was scrolling over each word waiting for the hand to appear before I could find the link. Anyway, maybe the problem is on my end, and if so, I’ll take a look at a couple of friends monitors when I get a chance and see if it the colors are more distinguished.

JZ

I’m…not seeing any blue links… Does this mean anything to anyone?

:wink:

My wedding anniversary is August 26th.

Ianzin, I read with interest your page about no shipments to France. I had no idea that French post was so unreliable. Which makes me wonder if this is the case with shipments of anything from anybody, or do they have something against your book or material? French psychics or magicians banding together to prevent the public from becoming educated?

Interesting example, Tarkin, although notice aslo the use of the “vanishing negative.” The question about whether it was an accident was phrased in the negative, so the “Douche” could have said, “Yes, I didn’t think it was an accident” and claimed that as a hit as well.

We didn’t give examples of the editing process because the Staff Report was already pretty long and we thought most people are familiar with TV-editing. Also, it’s difficult to have real-life examples. That’s why we cited the Skeptical Inquirer article, where the guy smuggled in a tape recorder and could compare the televised show with the actual show. I highly recommend that article if you’d like some more examples.

But, consider, it could be as grotesque as:
Actual version:
Pseudo-Psychic: Are you enjoying the show so far?
Subject: Yes, indeed!
Pseudo-Psychic: And I see you have a deceased uncle named Charlie, he died of some sort of brain tumor just recently, in March, wasn’t it?
Subject: No, I don’t have any relative who’s died recently of brain tumor…

Televised version:
Pseudo-Psychic: And I see you have a deceased uncle named Charlie, he died of some sort of brain tumor just recently, in March, wasn’t it?
Subject: Yes, indeed!

BTW, I don’t like the use of the term “moron” to refer to a subject. Being astounded by a cold-reader is no different than being astounded by a sleight-of-hand magician – it’s not a question of intelligence, it’s a matter of training.

Redsland, do you mean you don’t see any blue text, or you don’t see any blue underlined text?

Or something else?

In Ian’s site, he doesn’t use underlining for links like many web pages do. Move your mouse over the blue text. If if changes to a finger, that’s a link, underlined or not.

Does that clear up the problem?

Dex, thanks for the info about the SD mailing list. I always assumed that feature was not all that useful and who wants more email these days? But I see I was wrong, and I signed up for it. Now I’m part of the In Crowd. :cool:

Dex is psychic! My brother’s birthday is August 26th, and he wears glasses! Dex, when are you taking your show on the road? :smiley:

Sorry if I missed it somewhere on your site ianzin but how much is ::silly UK pound symbol::32 in USD?

It might be worthwhile putting the USD value next to the UK value in parentheses (sp?).

Also, a very minor nitpick, I notice the discount code is case sensitive. I might’ve wasted your time with another one of those emails if I hadn’t thought to go back and try it in caps. Just something to consider.

Oh, and both of my parents were at Woodstock, which was late August. (Was it 22-23-24 or 26-27-28 or other?).

Thanks to all for the useful feedback. I do welcome any and all ideas which will help to make my site more user-friendly. The only minor point I would plea in my defence is that very often the issues involved are ones I have already visited many times since I first traded online in 2001, and may not be quite as simple as they at first appear!

Re the colour of links and whether they can readily be seen… I’m going to bide my time and see whether this is a common enough problem for it to warrant the time and labour involved in changing the way all the links appear. I have only just re-coded and redesigned the site, so I think the ‘jury is still out’ on whether the links are clear enough or not. But I’m sorry any of you have had problems. (Yes, if I had done the site in Dreamweaver I could change the way the links appear in a few minutes, providing this was implemented as a macro feature common to all pages. But I didn’t, and so I can’t, and so I will have to make a change on every single page. C’est la vie.)

Re the US value of the book, on the Useful Information page I provide a currency converter which will allow you to convert the price of anything on my site to any currency you want. It’s there, I promise you! The answer is that the exchange rate is very roughly 1.6, so 32 of Her Majesty’s pounds is roughly 50 Washingtons, but the discount code gives you 40 percent off.

I could put the price in USD but please understand I sell books to customers in 36 different countries. If I do it for one…

Discount Code beng case sensitive… good point. I’ll see if I can change that without too much grief. But the code was provided in Dex’s article in the correct form!

Thanks to you all for your interest and your feedback.

ianzin writes:

> The answer is that the exchange rate is very roughly 1.6, so 32
> of Her Majesty’s pounds is roughly 50 Washingtons, but the
> discount code gives you 40 percent off.

This is a minor point, but the exchange rate at the moment is actually about 1.7. 32 pounds is thus about $54.40.

Ianzin! Why didn’t Dex tell us it was you! I always enjoy reading your erudite posts. No wonder you’re so generous to us, being a Doper yourself. Thanks again!

Like I said, I had no problems with your site. I thought the ordering section was fairly easy to navigate, and I much prefer having everything spelled out so clearly. My monitor works fine, so I had no trouble with the links.

Looking forward to reading your book! (Even more now that I know who wrote it!)

Ianzin, I just ordered your book, too. Thank you very much for your great offer. Hopefully it arrives soon, I’m really looking forward to it.

I saw the Amazing Kreskin ten years ago in college. After the performance, I set out to figure out every trick and within a week, I figured out them all. Still, I got into enormous arguments with people sure I was wrong and Kreskin wasn’t a fake. Some tricks were very sophisticated and required a great deal of skill, (Hypnosis for one.) and some could be pulled off by any sidewalk Grifter.

I discovered some principles for those who want to debunk psychics or go into the biz themselves:

First thing, although some people really believe in the Psychic, most people are skeptics. However, they want to believe in the PHENOMENON of psychic ability. Why? Because THEY want to BE psychic. THEY want to be able to read minds, tell the future and communicate with the dead. If this guy can do it, you might be able to one day too.

A good Psychic will actually fan the skepticism of himself. You can’t be “too perfect” or people will get suspicious. You want the Subject to think they must help the Psychic with their own ESP for the Psychic to succeed. Instead, they send out the overt info subconsciously, the Psychic makes the Big Hit, and the Subject is floored. They “know” the Psychic was real because they “felt” it. They are really less impressed with the Psychic’s ability then their own because they feel their efforts to psychicly tell things to the Psychic WORKED.

Kreskin starts the show off, interestingly enough, by telling everyone he is NOT a Psychic. Moreover, he dares to expose anyone claiming to be a Psychic, even offers up money if anyone can prove the existence of Psychic ability!

This is a brilliant move because he’s raised the ire of the audience who want to prove Kreskin wrong. No need. His later actions “prove” himself wrong.

Kreskin claims he is not a Psychic but a MENTALIST. But he doesn’t bother to explain what the hell a Mentalist is. The Audience makes their own definition: A Mentalist is a Psychic only for Real. My Definition: A Mentalist is a Psychic that admits that they are phoney and just doing tricks. Brilliant reverse psychology, though.

He had the audience write down three things on a scrap of paper then had the audience put the scraps in envelopes. Seal them and sit on them at the end of each aisle. Then he did typical Psychic mumbo jumbo, leading in a meandering path to a few unimpressive things but finished by accurately “guessing” a guy’s Social Security Number.

It was a Hot Read. Kreskin first just dumped the envelopes in the middle of the room. Since his intruction was for each aisle to have an envelope, he had to go back into the audience and pick up some and move them out to the sides. And, no doubt in the process, PALM a few scraps.

So, if Kreskin palmed sheets, why the awkward, “I’m getting the name of a man beginning with a B or a D”? If he just read the scrap, you’d suspect a trick. If he goes through the stupid @@@Woo Woo@@@ you “know” he’s not reading. Plus he shows his incompetance a few times until he lazers in on the Ten-Digit number no one could possibly Cold Read. His “best” discernment is with a guy with his driver’s licence in hand ordered to “clearly” visualise the number. See. Kreskin needs your help to succeed.

Then there’s the Grand Finale. Hide the Check. I’ve seen him do this on TV several times, so I suppose it’s his Big Closer. Kreskin says he’ll leave for a while and the Audience gets to hide his check anywhere they want in the auditorium. If he can’t find it in ten minutes, he doesn’t get paid. He’s blindfolded and holds the hand of an audience member so he doesn’t bump into things.

How Kreskin finds the Check is pretty simple. I imagine it’s merely the “Clever Hans Phenomenon.” The closer he is, the tenser the audience gets.

Of course, making a Bee-Line for the Check wouldn’t stun and amaze. We’ve got to get down to the wire. Nine minutes and 45 seconds of awkward fumbling then a Bee-Line for the Check is better. But Kreskin can top that. HE FAILS! How does he fail? You make him fail!

While Kreskin is gone somebody stands up, says he knows a little trap door on the stage that is virtually invisible. He thinks it would be funny if the check was right under Kreskin’s feet the whole time. He tries to get it open but can’t find it. Someone suggests under the Mic stand, but that’s too obvious. Then this Guy gets a brilliant idea. Let’s all PRETEND the Check is under the Mic stand. Then the audience picks another place out in the audience.

Like sure fire, Kreskin comes out and every time he leaves the stage, he’s “Stragely drawn back.” With a dramatic burst, he turns over the Mic stand and asks if the Check is there. Soon he starts feeling the stage for that secret trap door himself. The audience chuckles as time expires. Kreskin is to go home penniless.

You won. You fooled Kreskin. Your psychic powers won over his. He’s not so Amazing now, is he?

Then someone in the audience confesses to the trick. The audience decides to let Kreskin have Do-Overs and be good. He finds the check within a minute.

Obviously, the trick would be a sham if there was a Plant in the audience telling Kreskin where to go. Hence the blindfold.

Come on, Peeps. The GUY is the PLANT. The Plant doesn’t tell the audience where to put the check but how to try to fool Kreskin. Again brilliant Reverse Psychology. Who would plant someone in the audience to try to get him to miss out on his lunch money?

Interesting comments, SunSawed. Most of what you describe are things that I would call sleight-of-hand, and admittedly we didn’t cover them in the psychic discussion.

Those tricks wouldn’t work (for instance) for a carnival fortune-teller doing a one-on-one reading, but cold readings do work.

my birthday is August 26th. Jeez maybe Dex is psychic :wink:

That was trippy.
My birthday is on August 26th as well. :cool:

I ordered Ian’s book a week ago, and what did I find on my porch when I got home this afternoon? A white par avion envelope with pictures of a tiara-wearin’ lady on the front. Hooray for the USPS and the Royal Mail!

Just wanted to mention that my Dad, who wore glasses, died in late August. I think that just how easy cold reading is has been pretty well demonstrated by the responses in this thread.

I got the book today. It looks fabulous! The bits I’ve read are entertaining and very well written. I can’t wait to read the whole thing and astound my friends with my amazing mental powers.

Thanks, Ian!