They can, actually. The recovered pieces of the fuselage were reassembled on a frame in a building in Virginia, and are now used by the NTSB for training crash investigators.
But the NTSB would have to grant them access, and certainly won’t, which means they’re covering something up …
I told the MIB to wait. From the news article in the OP:
(bolding mine)
CNN, too. They currently have the headline “Film: TWA 800 crash was no accident”. I didn’t notice any typos, though.
Thanks.
How about the one in which an orbiting satellite with a directed energy weapon was used to bring down the WTC by causing all of the metal supporting framework to turn to dust.
FYI, The David Johnson mentioned in this article has an office right next to mine, and George Slenski is now retired, but he comes in all the time anyway.
I think this is the most significant finding: they used silver plated nuts on the electrical terminal blocks inside the fuel tank.
Apparently,
Silver + regular jet fuel = no problem.
But they later switched to using low-sulfur jet fuel:
Silver + low-sulfur jet fuel = bad.
Maybe they meant that too many regulations (ordinances) brought down the plane.
Why would they silver plate nuts on the inside of the fuel tank? It’s very conductive, but it’s known to oxidize and is a catalyst in a lot of reactions.
And his Koran.
It’s also a very effective anti-seize coating, although more useful at higher temperature locations where organic coatings break down.
No doubt their anti-seize properties came into play when the fuel tank exploded. Musta been kinda hot. 
The establishment who has this kind of protection doesn’t have to worry about its misdeeds.
Some of the entries are quite funny.
I got another one for you: Michael Hastings sent a cryptic email hours before his death
Can’t wait for the “funny” to rebuke this “conspiracy” that wrote itself.
More importantly, how?
Firing a live missile and shooting down a plane would require several people on a Navy ship.
Most of those people will be looking to cover their own asses and not be concerned with the asses of others.
And everybody on that ship, every single person, would know for a fact that a missile had been launched, it’s unmistakeable.
This looks like a bunch of vague, doomy nonsense, but maybe that’s just what they want me to think.
Yup.
Not to mention any ‘accidental firing’ would be noticed by more than a few people back at the docks: “Hey didn’t you have an even dozen missiles when you left?” “Uh…it fell overboard?!”
Perhaps more to the point is that the fuselage of TWA800 is one display and used for training for accident analysis. In all that time nobody has gone ‘Hey, wait a minute’.
Some folks should also read the ‘Beyond the Black Box’ chapter of ‘Stiff’ by Mary Roach. The bodies say fuel explosion.
These 'whistleblowers remind me very much of the retired, decrepit ‘Structural Eningeers’ that the 911 crowd convinced to sign their petitions.
Fire has never melted popsicle sticks!
How about cardboard tubes?
Or metal ring washers! 
A lawsuit filed in Massachusetts federal court on Monday has accused the United States Department of Defense, the United States Navy, and contractors Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation of a cover-up of the 1996 aviation incident resulting in the death of all 230 passengers and crew members aboard Trans World Airlines (TWA) Flight 800.
The wrongful death suit claims that Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) evidence has ” emerged proving that TWA 800’s explosion was not caused by any defect in the airplane, but instead by an errant United States missile fired at aerial target drones flying nearby. “
Needs to check the evendence he claims, but already I noticed this item:
- Indeed, the FBI essentially froze the NTSB out of the investigation. The FBI removed all copies (original and duplicates) of Navy radar tapes from the Navy, placing them out of the NTSB’s reach, and refused to allow the NTSB to conduct eyewitness interviews or review the FBI’s records that indicated the true cause of the TWA 800 crash
Uh, that is not what the FBI did, declaring that it froze the NTSB out needs a big fat cite.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-106shrg65055/html/CHRG-106shrg65055.htm
[Senate Hearing 106-534]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
S. Hrg. 106-534
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERSIGHT OF THE INVESTIGATION OF TWA FLIGHT 800 ( MAY 10, 1999)
Contrary to what is stated in your question, the FBI did allow the NTSB to take photographs in furtherance of their investigation. Procedures regarding wreckage photography by NTSB, including the wearing of red ``safety vests’’ were agreed to by NTSB managers at Calverton early in the investigation. At the time, both the FBI and the NTSB were concerned about unauthorized photographs being taken and being misused to the detriment of the investigation as well as such photographs being exploited in the media thereby increasing the
grief of the families of the victims.
Seems to me that the same exaggeration is being pressed when they declare other evidence to had been off limits to the NTSB.
Like that, I noticed a lot of already debunked items added in that lawsuit, besides the “small” issue of not finding missile fragments or impacts or pressure hits that would come from a missile. Will see if the “new” evidence shows something else, but after seeing what they added as supporting “evidence” I seriously doubt it.