There is press coverage of the massacre. I am not saying the story is being ignored. It just seems to me to not be getting the coverage it ought.
Cnn.com The main story on the front page. BBC.com same
New York Times on the front page below the fold.
Reddit news.Not on the front page at the moment.
NY Post. Not mentioned on the front page,
NY Daily News Same
Daily Mail Same
Globe & Mail Same
Los Angeles Times Same
Jewish Telegraph Agency Same
Just by the way.
Washington Post has a line of links at the top of the webpage. It has a link to the full story but no actual headline on the main page. It could be an algorithmic decision since I’m logged in.
imho … he shouldn’t have gotten any coverage at all … fleas like him need to be burned at the stake … for taking other innocent lives in his “agenda” … definitely does not constitute any ‘immortalization’.
My first thought was: Is this in the ethnically Malay part of Thailand? Because amok is a culture-bound phenomenon for Malays. Nope, it was a long way from there.
From what I’ve read, the shooter was upset about a housing deal gone wrong. WTF? Something bad happens, so the obvious response is to kill and cripple dozens and dozens of strangers?
Terrorism for a cause, however worthless, seems more explainable at least.
Responding to the OP, the shooting has been on my ordinary Google newsfeed since it happened. It was the very first hit when it happened, and now has dropped down a bit, but I’d say it’s got regular coverage. (Posting from Canada.)