Its looking like the U.K. is moving towards getting involved in Syria, though not through any genuine ethical considerations, more because IMO P.M. Cameron as head of a not overly popular coalition government, that probably won’t last long appears to be desperate to get his name into the history books (Or maybe get himself a Nobel Peace Prize) as some sort of international statesman.
To get his way, he’s been acting like the Lone Ranger, sticking his nose in crisis after crisis, dishing out foreign aid with a lavish hand while ordering cutbacks at home.
Generally it appears to me across the Islamic regions of the the M.E. and N.Africa, that there are those who as some sort of internet popular mob ethos, shout democracy, demonstrate for democracy and eventually are forced into fighting for democracy, while having no idea who or what is going to replace the regime they’ve suddenly decided that they’re against.
Usually applauded and encouraged by naïve Westerners who think that anyone acting against an established order, let alone not very pleasant dictatorships must themselves be nice guys themselves .
The Syrian rebels have executed unarmed prisoners, and Sunni civilians themselves, though like any movements of this kind we get fractionalism in a bid to deny responsibility.
Oh no it wasn’t us who committed the atrocity it was others fighting against- insert name here-, they’re the "So and so "resistance group, while we’re the "This that and the other"resistance group, honest.
Many years ago we saw the absaloute ruler, the Shah of Iran deposed, and we’ve seen whats come to replace him.
We deposed Saddam, and now the butchery in Iraq makes life infinitely worse for most Iraqis.
The so called "Arab Spring "has now resulted in a military government in Egypt.
Semi secular dictators are likely to be replaced by extreme Islamists, or division and anarchy, neighbour killing neighbour.
And whatever the result theres no improvement in life, no more freedom for the populace, and definitely no Western style democracies as replacements.
And unlikely to be until there is an entire shift of cultural values across these countries and a collective will of the mass of the populations that this is really what they want.
For example, in some countries the status and and role of woman is considered abhorrent to many liberal Westerners, but is happily embraced by the women themselves.
In the West the change of viewpoint from feudal/religious government to desiring Western liberal democracy took historically, a long, long time.
Even with mass communication and mass education, its going to take more then a quick revolution to change the mind set of the majority in these countries.
The desire for change seems to be based more on Sunnis and Shias, being at loggerheads with each other, with Shias not so much wanting democracy, as thinking that its their turn to get their hands on all of the national goodies.
Unfortunately the West encourages these events, with all of the mass suffering and death, by allowing the insurgents to think that if it all goes horribly wrong, then they’ll get military/financial aid from the West, plus political pressure on the regime they’re fighting against, or failing that they’ll go into a comfortable exile if they lose.
If they didn’t think that these options were available it would be debateable if they’d be so eager to start these ill thought out insurrections going off at half cock.
Personally I find Assads regime abhorrent, but can’t see the rebels replacing it with anything better, and probably with a creation that will be a hell of a lot worse for everyone concerned.
And you can guarantee, that far from feeling gratitude towards the West, the insurgents if successful, will blame every bad event in their countries for the next half century at least, on the wicked imperialists who involved themselves in their affairs .
Though I’d love to be totally wrong about all of the above.
I live in hope.