To me the thing is UFO’s DO occur and the idea they are from another planet, another time, or another dimension, are just another possibility. I mean really strange craft fly across the sky or even land. Sometimes even near air force bases, and nobody knows what the heck they are. The pilots, the people on the ground, the people manning the radar - just dont know.
Yeahbut aliens who’ve figured out how to get around the speed of light restriction would surely have the technology to get around those pesky laws of thermodynamics.
Cite?
Technological progress is likely to be a sigmoid curve- after a while you meet the limits of growth, then you literally can’t get anywhere any faster.
In the ‘Fermi Paradox’ thread I made the mistake of discounting the phenomenon of a growth curve; you can access vast amounts of energy and resources in the early parts of the growth process, but later on this growth must slow down, simply because of time and distance. So I’d expect to see a lot of middle-sized civilisations, exploiting their local resources efficiently - but if they get too large, the’d stagnate. The amount of energy, resources and computing power that they could devote to a problem or project would start to show diminishing returns, so they’d never be able to command enough energies to do the really interesting stuff.
And in any case we don’t even see any evidence of these middle-sized, exponentiating empires - if they had magic tech, their cities would glow as bright as stars in the dark light years.
I’ve read all about the various sightings near air force bases, both in the US and elsewhere. Like so much else the sightings do not stand up to scrutiny. Read Ian Ridpath’s excellent analysis of the Rendlesham Forest incident, for example.
Inserting aliens from another world into situations when you don’t the what the cause is yet?
“I don’t know who robbed the liqueur store last night-could be aliens!”
“Who put a dent in my car bumper when I was at the store? Could be aliens.”
“I’m not quite ready to accept the blame for global change, because aliens be be the cause”
“I wouldn’t be too quick to blames the Russians for illegal voter influence until we can rule out aliens.”
Yep, could be…we have no way of knowing or when it might happen.
(although of course if there’s a point where we can make accurate predictions about every phenomenon that we are aware of we might suspect we’ve reached the end)
Yep, but as you’re implying, even just from what we know, those diminishing returns will not kick in until we’re talking about a civilization harnessing energies, resources and data processing rates many, many, many orders of magnitude greater than humans have so far mustered.
But when we’re talking about vast interstellar empires then, yes, from what we know, the distances involved will cause many inefficiencies and perhaps growth will slow.
However bear in mind how old the universe is and how long it’s likely to survive into the future: I don’t see how you get from growth *slowing *to there being a barrier to doing the really interesting stuff.
Sure and that’s the paradox. The paradox exists whether or not a person is as optimistic about the possibilities as I am.
Even a species a couple centuries more advanced than humans could probably litter the galaxy with 0.5c bric-a-brac in a relatively short time. Why don’t we see it?