If your income fell 25% during five months of the year, how many things would you have to choose to live without during those months? What if your income fell 40%?
You work from a base presumption that everyone parties, spends money foolishly, buys luxuries constantly and that the millions and millions of us without insurance are only in that position because we’re failing to be properly frugal, we’re wasting money and not living up to the curlcoat standard of budget management.
But you have absolutely no evidence whatsoever to base this presumption upon.
You’re also continuing to ignore that universal coverage – which it is important to note is not even close to being on the table in the U.S. – would lower the costs for everyone because the pool will be expanded to include everyone. So all those healthy young people will be in the pool, putting in their dollars and spreading out the risk so that older, sicker folks like you and me won’t be facing $10k a year in premiums, and not so old folks like bootyperana won’t be facing $6k a year in premiums, and the average premium for a family of four won’t be roughly the cost of an economy car every year.
But people like you, screaming and yelling about not wanting to pay anyone else’s way and screw the “irresponsible” people and not wanting your coverage to change and me me me me me memememememe I’ve got mine, screw everyone else OMG socialism derailed any chance that we might actually get truly universal, money-saving, life-saving coverage in this country any time in probably my lifetime, let alone yours. So you keep ranting on and on about universal healthcare and it’s not even an option. You can’t even keep your inaccurate and assumption-laden complaining in the realm of reality. Why should we pay your constant gibbering any attention whatsoever?