Everyone has good and bad stories about the NHS. Not a single one of Fierra’s relatives and friends in the UK has anything positive to say about it. She certainly doesn’t.
When she had carbon monoxide poisoning, she had to wait 16 hours in the ER before a doctor saw her for triage. Until then, she sat in a chair and tried to stay conscious.
With her kidney surgery she needed, she was told there was going to be a wait measured in years. To simply discuss the result of a kidney scan test, she was scheduled to wait months. When she came over here and was put on my insurance (as an aside, yes, my company does cover “same sex partners”, which I found to my great surprise), she got in for her surgery within two months, and the only reason it took that long was because they tried another procedure first (reputedly not available in the UK) to try to fix it without invasive surgery. The surgeon here said that with the wait she had in the UK, she would likely have lost the kidney completely (she was down to 40% function). Instead, she has nearly 100% function now.
In the UK, she was told the only procedure covered by NHS was a full-incision one, with a 6-inch cut and a 1-2 week recovery time. In the US, she had laproscopic, and was out in 2 days.
Ironically, a few weeks after she was home and recovering well from her surgery, her office in the UK sent her a letter to let her know they were ready to discuss her test results with her, finally. :rolleyes:
I’m sure plenty can give good examples of how NHS works for them. IME and Fierra’s, all is not sunshine and puppy dogs. There are advantages to NHS, and, obviously, disadvantages. Without insurance, Fierra’s surgery would have cost about $35,000. At the time, I could have written a check for that and not really been terribly put out; I’ll hazard 99.9% of the people I know would not be able to do the same, and would be somewhat screwed, resorting to loans, second mortgages, or worse.