According to cnn/si, Eddings had already caught Pierszynski napping in the second on an identical call when he was catching. He thought he had a srikeout against Anderson and had already fired the ball to third base before Eddings let him know he thought it was a no-catch.
So Pierszynski would have had it in his head to play through ALL third-strike plays the rest of the night with that ump…
Oh take a pill. And wipe your glasses. He was watching the game with two Cub fans, haters of all things White Sox, and they managed to see both the complaining and blame.
Clean the hate and invectives from your eyes and you’d see it too.
Well, your assessment is clearly in the minority, and even the ever vocal and opinionated Ozzie Guillen dodged the question when he was asked about the play. I do believe the ball did change direction. I also think the ball was in the mitt when this happened, with the bottom of the webbing of the catcher’s mitt being against the ground. Lack of dirt seems to confirm my observations.
Regardless, the ump should have been clearer and fucked up. With the way Buehrle was pitching and the lack of Angels bats, the Sox probably would have won the game anyway. But I don’t like seeing this kind of finish.
Looks to me like a clean catch. Catcher deserved a bit of the blame for not being, well, paranoid about a horrible call possibly being made (and I don’t mean that sarcastically), but blue borked the call. And if extending his arm to the right and a fist pump with his left hand is how he merely calls a strike, he’s an idiot, too. Does he do a roundhouse if someone’s out at the plate?
So I’m an asshole, maybe I should be the one to take the pill huh?
Scioscia’s right it never should have come to that but it did. His catcher wasn’t playing smart, and AJ was. In sports, you play til you hear a whistle, or in this case til you hear “out” being called. Caught napping, or if you will, being “glib”.
The dust I saw kicked up came as the ball skipped and threw dust behind Paul’s glove. Maybe it was from his glove as the ball hit, maybe it was from the ball, who can tell?
Everyone has seen the same replays, and yet there’s two clear divisions on what happened. People with the advantage of looking at replays and close ups can’t agree, yet that makes the umps wrong or right when they have to make the call on the spot without advantage of replay. They called what they called, and everyone lives with it. The Sox, like every other team in the league has lost games due to their share of umpire fuckovers, yesterday was the Angels’ turn.
Oh sorry, was that glib and condescending, or just realistic?
By the way, sometimes you can tell the assholes by the way they make arguments and personal and resort to name calling to prove their point. Don’t you think?
Well, whatever else happened, at least the result gets ChiSox third base coach Joey Cora off the hook. I mean, what the fuck was he thinking sending Aaron Rowand home after that double down the right field line? Rowand would have been at third base with no-one out.
I can understand sending the runner if there’s two out, but with no-one out the odds of getting a runner home from third are pretty damn good. All it takes is an outfield fly, or even an infield grounder that doesn’t go straight to a fielder. The fly ball hit by Crede two batters later would have got him home on a sacrifice, and the White Sox would have been up 2-1.
There was a significant misunderstanding between the ump and the Angels players. The ump clearly pumped his fist after signalling a strike (or strikeout?). But supposedly he had been doing this all night to signal strikes. Why he would be ambiguous in this way is strange. Even Scioscia, in his initial confrontation with the ump, can be seen pumping his fist and saying something along the lines of “you called him out. You called him out.” Before this, the ump is seen telling one of the players, “I never called him out,” seemingly in reply to that player’s own understanding of the result of the play. What may have happened is that the Angels players, including the catcher, went through the motions after getting their third out, but the batter, being particularly sharp remembered that this particular umpire’s quirky way of calling strikes and outs meant he was still alive, so he took a harmless sprint toward base and it worked out right for him and his team.
Perhaps there is no consensus in the rules on how an ump signals an out or strikeout? This is strange. What if an ump determines that the best way to signal a player or coach’s ejection is to give him a big, friendly bear hug or to pat him on the butt? I always figured that pumping a fist meant an out was officially made and that sweeping your arms across and away from your body meant a runner had safely reached the next base. I’m surprised that these signals are not officially recognized but seemingly open to some kind of artistic interpretation.
Umpires are given fairly wide latitude on exactly how they make hand signals to call strikes and outs. If I recall correctly, a general “make a pointing gesture with your right hand” is all the specific direction they’re given when calling strikes behind the plate. I remember seeing a documentary about umpiring several years ago in which umps are even told to develop their own characteristic motion, and be consistent with it, so that it becomes their “style”.
I think the “consistent” part was missing from this guy’s performance last night.
Well, even if he was 100% consistent with the call, it’s still a problem if the same gesture means a completely different thing than what is accepted by MLB as a whole. Fist pump=out, any way you slice it.
The batter, AJ Pierzynski- a cather himself- was victimized by a similar play last year. Makes sense he’d remember it and run, just in case.
[QUOTE=Troy McClure SFLooks to me like a clean catch. Catcher deserved a bit of the blame for not being, well, paranoid about a horrible call possibly being made (and I don’t mean that sarcastically), but blue borked the call. And if extending his arm to the right and a fist pump with his left hand is how he merely calls a strike, he’s an idiot, too. Does he do a roundhouse if someone’s out at the plate?[/QUOTE]
That, really, is the point here.
In the end it doesn’t really matter if the ball was caught cleanly or not. You could go either way; that’s fine, it’s part of baseball.
The real problem here is that the umpire didn’t clearly make the call. If Eddings cannot clearly get across that two motions DON’T mean “Strike three, you’re out,” he’s a shitty umpire. It’s Doug Eddings’s job to clearly indicate what the call is. It is not the job of the Angels or White Sox to divine from his actions, based on past experience, what his little hand motions mean. Eddings has a responsibility as a major league umpire to make it absolutely crystal clear what he’s calling. And his call was as confusing to me, a player and umpire for 20 years, as it was to the Angels, as it was to anyone else.
Eddings fucked up by making a BAD call, not a wrong call. He deserves scorn.