http://mrpalmguru.com/uncyclopedia/index.php?title=Main_Page
“Uncyclopedia is an encyclopedia full of misinformation and utter lies. It’s sort of like Congress. It serves absolutely no purpose, so feel free to add to the misinformation right now! This is possibly the only factual page, before everything turns into a puddle of utter confusion and disarray”
Cool. I just added entries for “Walt Disney” and “Elephant”!
I like their entries about how Oprah brought to life the second coming of Adolf Hitler in the form of Dr. Phil.
I saw the title of this thread and thought for a minute it was a misplaced pitting …
Nope! It’s a totally accurate description … and I love it!
Oh, Pochacco, I’m somewhat disappointed that you added entries for “Walt Disney” and didn’t bother to define “McQueeristan”! I may have to join just to do that …
I just added an entry for philosophers
This is fun. I should do another!
How do you create a new catagory? 
And, since with this crowd it had to be done eventually, I give you the entry for 1920’s style “Death Rays.”
This is perfect. And I hoped they’d be using the Wikipedia engine: That’s some good code, even if the content is utter crap.
This place could be Wikipedia’s evil twin, the Bizarropedia.
I know I’ll be adding crap to this. 
How do you add an entry?
One way is to create a link in another entry, then follow the link and fill in content.
E.g. create a link to [[Cheesetown]] on the “United States of America” page, and then click on the Cheesetown link and get creative. Inelegant, but it works.
Ok I got it to work, check out my entry on Euclid’s Axioms (http://mrpalmguru.com/uncyclopedia/index.php?title=Euclid’s_Axioms), and if someone could fix the coding so it looks pretty, that’d be great. Not sure why the math button just displays “<math>”.
Also, I tried to put the axioms in list form but that didn’t work. How do you do that?
Put an
Not sure about the math coding, though.
Now, I’m going to start looking around this place…
I propose a game.
Try to find a topic which has a crazier entry on Wikipedia than it does on Uncyclopedia. Either to prove that truth is stranger than fiction, or to encourage people to rewrite the Uncyclopedia article and make it funnier, or just to waste time. In any case, I nominate Nostradamus, though I’m sure it’s not the best example.
You can go deeper by adding more asterisks:
I don’t think it actually handles math coding, and I’ve played with it both there and at Wikipedia.
It’s too bad: Wikipedia’s LaTeX rendering is really very good, and it can add so much to an article.
I added some junk to each heading on the Flamewar Guidelines page, just because I could. This is fun!
That is some funny stuff! My favorites were Kitten Huffing and Giant Elephant. I was sore from laughing. I’ll be checking out that place from now on!
Brilliant! As if I wasn’t killing enough time on-line as it is…
Funny stuff!
I just created a page on Esperanto
I changed the word’s Lesbia to Lesbos, since a truth wrapped in a lie is more convincing, and did an incompetent link to a cartoon about Spiderman for the entry on Japan, which was than corrected by the proprietors.
Couldn’t help myself. The entry on “Scotland” was only two lines long.