Unexpected Different Attitudes In Older Works

I was stunned by this and did a little googling. I found the text for a “Science Fiction Monthly” from 1976. It mentions this story but describes it as the girl tricking the ship’s captain by signing on for the voyage without any intention of doing the required job. The captain then “beguiles her into fulfilling her function unawares,” according to the article.

So in 1976, a semi-scholarly SF review considered sexual assault of an unconscious woman to be a simple matter of beguiling her.

My theory is that many writers of the 1950’s through 1970’s, particularly those who considered them selves part of the counterculture, considered rape to be just another sexual taboo. If you believed that the old norms were wrong, and that things like sex outside of marriage or sex for fun were cool, then why not underage sex, or non-consensual sex? Why listen to what society says? Why be a prude?

To be fair, that was Roger Sterling’s reaction, which I thought was intended as another example of his obnoxiously callous personality. (Draper referred to the accident as “a terrible tragedy”). The exchange was actually pretty funny: in response to “He’s going to lose the foot”, Sterling replied with mock regret, “Just after he got it in the door!”

My younger brother and I had a similar experience, flying from DTW from mom to Reno with dad. I remember the date exactly: August 3, 1981, because it was a big event, and caused our continuing flight from DFW to be cancelled. American treated us awesomely, though, and we got to ride from DFW to to Love Field to catch a Braniff flight they’d arranged for us. Apparently the ATC at Love Field hadn’t walked out.

Out of sheer curiosity: may I ask whether Spenser’s girlfriend ever either starved to death or at least wound up in a hospital with an anorexia diagnosis? She ate less with every book; but although Parker kept making a point of how little she was eating, it never seemed to be presented as a problem. I stopped reading them after a while, I couldn’t stand it.

Happens in the book, too. Her personality is completely transformed and she talks exclusively about the Navy after that incident. From a modern perspective, she’s completely traumatized by what is, in effect, a mass rape and is thereby transformed from an ambitious, motivated go-getter (if evil) to a sexual toy. Ouch.

Hmm. I don’t remember it well, but I recall one Travis Magee novel - where I trainwrecked on the series - where Travis’ investigation leads him to a local trailer court where lesbians lived. His response to their talking back - and acting pretty stereotypically butch and dumb - is to just sort of beat some sense into them with a golf club. It’s not just that, though. It was his attitude while doing it. Had he been dealing with a male character he’d have taken it seriously and beat the dude down. When coming at these women his attitude was more of ‘this is something to not take seriously and let’s just drive them off like some stray dogs or something’.

It’s been a long time but if I remember correctly, sometime in the late 1980s or early 1990s she left Spenser for a while and then he saved her. She became a successful psychologist in Cambridge and other than the over the top cutesy stuff became more of a “realistic” female character. She was always a little waspy and vain and I think Parker used her food eccentricities to highlight her delicateness vs the Spencer character, but you’re right that a person can’t survive by nibbling the lettuce off a club sandwich.

This actually isn’t a book I read so it’s kind of hearsay I guess, but I remember a friend once mentioning reading an older book in which a female character who’s about to turn 30 is worried about approaching “middle age”, the implication being that age 30 was the start of being middle aged.

There was a long-running radio soap opera, The Romance of Helen Trent that used the same premise. The opening:

All sorts of alternate sex stuff, there was an author that a friend of our roomies ‘dated’ a couple times who figured if someone didn’t end up bruised and bleeding it wasn’t a good date, she wrote a bunch of books about women in various forms of sexual slavery like Crystals of Mida or the Terrilian series … complete with livingly described bondage rape scenes with no safe word

Wouldn’t work for a friend of mine, she has a satellite phone. She does a lot of driving through pretty empty areas, and decided the thousand bucks or so a year for something she might only use to call AAA once a year is worth it. She also packs a gun, so I wouldn’t try ambushing her. But then again, I carry concealed when I road tri as well, mrAru said he would rather bail me out of jail than ID me in a morgue.

Did that into the 70s, born in 1961 and my brother [bprn in 59] and I roamed around with gangs of friends and cousins, we sort of free ranged lunch, Mom would boot us out after breakfast and we had to be home when the YMCA camp blew chow call and we would get bathroom breaks and lunch wherever we ended up closest to.

I had a Japanese hair stick, an antique that I bought at an auction back in the early 1970s that had a hidden blade in it that was about 2 inches long and perhaps a quarter inch wide, and about an eighth of an inch thick at the back spine. It was carven out of some sort of horn or bone and the whole thing was rather pretty.

We had a couple as roomies back when mrAru was stationed in Norfolk VA, she had the fantasy of being gang raped by bikers. At one point I was almost pissed enough at her to call some old neighbors from when I lived on 13th Bay street to arrange it. I guarantee she would not have enjoyed reality.

Duplicated sort of in one of Piers Anthony’s Dictator series, the one set on the spaceship, they ‘ships head’ was a woman that would have vag sex with the CO and XO, oral with the rest of the officers and give hand jobs to the enlisteds [or something like that, been seriously long since I bothered reading it, I was stuck in hospital and there wasn’t much choice in books.]

Also in one of the 70s SF/F magazines was set post apocalyptic US, pair of men capture a black woman and calmly discuss screwing her and the guy that was actually married to her was going to just get head because he didn’t want sloppy seconds [the guys were white] though it was a ploy to get the bad guy to drop gun with his trou so they could kill him without getting shot.

I can attest that it literally just happened today. Just got off s plane from SF to Boston, and I sat next to an unaccompanied nine year old kid the whole way.

Just remembered - The Man With The Golden Gun.

This quote actually isn’t quite as awful as I remembered it - Fleming may even have been sending the myth up - but it certainly is something from a different time:

j

Huh? I was a kid in the 80’s, and, starting at age seven, every summer I traveled by train, solo, to my Grandma’s farm, some 700 kms or six hours away. Nothing to it.

Sure, satellite phones exist now, but they’re still uncommon enough that they’re no problem for thriller writers. If your plan would be foiled by a satellite phone, then you just don’t give the protagonist one, and nobody’s going to ask why they don’t have one.

For now. But when Musk puts 50 gazillion satellites up, everyone will have global VOIP. (But there won’t be any more vampires because the sky will be ablaze with reflected sunlight.)

This very line was burned into my mind too as a child. It’s so weird

Should we assume that the reason M was whistling was in appreciation of an attractive woman? One who was so exceptionally attractive that even the normally non-whistling M did so by reflex?

Okay, it’s been several days now and I haven’t stopped thinking about this. I’d love to ask Reality Chuck to indulge me by telling me all about this necktie business, spoilers be damned.

Just in case someone still wants to be surprised (near as I can remember it):

[spoiler]The issue was that someone was found murdered with all his clothes on backwards and everything in the room turned around.

Queen eventually figures out that the killer discovered the victim was a Catholic priest, who wore his collar backward, and that fact would reveal the murderer. So the killer switched everything around.

This was still in the era of celluloid collars, which were separate from the shirt. So why didn’t he just turn the collar around? It would be suspicious that he had no tie, leading them to realize he was a priest very quickly. Instead, everyone concentrated on asking why everything was backward.[/spoiler]