Unmarried adult Dopers -- do NOT have sex, say the Feds

The administration has got to find some way to get their faith-based base into the voting booth next week.

“See, we don’t turn a blind eye to the page-fuckers-- we are giving the pages the tools needed to not fuck at all!”

A triumph of willpower over the orgasim! Today nearly sixty thousand people have joined the Women’s Anti-Sex League.

All I knew about her was that she wore the red sash of the Women’s Anti-Sex League. I hate her.

Have you done this before?

Lots of times.

With Party members?

Not with Inner Party members, but there’s plenty of those bastards who would.

I hate purity. I hate goodness. I don’t want virtue to exist anywhere. I want everyone corrupt.

Well, I should suit you, then. I’m corrupt to the core.

All of the above are quotes from Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four.

Seems to me that something similar to this has come up before.

The balls on these people are huge if they think this is going to have any affect on young adults. What kind of fantasy world do they live in?

Ah, a new nitch-market, and another opportunity presents itself!

Cum git ur fake ID’s:

18 year old fake ID’s: $20
21 year old fake ID’s: $50
30 year old fake ID’s: Call for current market price…(PROFIT!)

Man - thank god I’m in Canada - I can continue to fuck with impunity.

Well, the federal government can just go fuck itself.
But only after it marries itself, of course.

Fiscal conservatism and smaller government only apply when we’re talking about things that would actually, like, help someone. You know, education, health programs, assistance to the poor, stupid stuff like that. OH, I almost forgot the most important thing - we MUST have smaller government when it comes to regulating large businesses in any way, whether it be protection for the workers or protection for the consumers/stockholders or protection of the environment (all of which big businesses always maintain as their first priorities anyway, as is well known). Lower taxes are highly desirable for those making in excess of $100K a year, and particularly important when it comes to protecting the dead billionaire’s innocent children, who might otherwise be reduced to mere millions! But as for those living at lower levels? Well, hell, those lucky stiffs may only be in the 15% bracket anyway, or worse yet, not be paying any taxes at all!

And funny how all those self-proclaimed leaning-Libertarians find a cut in taxes yielding them a couple-three hundred a year to be a far more important right than privacy in the bedroom or something silly like domestic surveillance of telephone calls, detention and torture without due process, or knowing the facts of just why we were invading a sovereign nation. And they must be far more important, because they just couldn’t bring themselves to vote for the Democrats - it was too risky, they claimed. Next thing you know, we might end up in totalitarian state, what with the looming threat of universal health care and all.
No, I’m not bitter. Why do you ask?

I suspect the real target of this approach is still kids under 18. They’re trying to deflect the likely objection from that age group, “Well, if it’s OK for adults why isn’t it OK for us?” By appearing include young adults in these statements they are attempting to take the wind out of that argument.

Oh, so that’s what the young kids are calling Manchester these days…

Well, so long as we can watch…

(Emphasis mine)

Well, of course. We don’t want the smart* people breeding.

*or the smart-assed, either.

Same thing. :wink:

Unfortunately, I seem to be falling in lockstep with this program already.

Lonely, so, so, lonely

Aw, shoot. Oh well.

That’s a brand of maple syrup, right? :wink:

But wait Kimstu! In the eyes of the government, I’m street legal. And don’t forget - I’m a liberal! Anything for you! :wink:

Oh that’s right Hentor, I forgot about us amoral liberals not objecting to adultery! Cool! So, I guess I’ll be the atheist feminist bisexual single-mother crack whore and you’ll be the pro-diplomacy pro-abortion social-engineering government bureaucrat? Standard liberal sex, in other words?

:slight_smile: Hmmm, I may have to be nameless’s atheist feminist bisexual single-mother crack whore too. Once his girlfriend leaves him, of course.

“Recriminalize fornication! Moving America forward to the nineteenth century!”

Another, equally depressing way to look at it is that the Republicans give Government money to faith-based organisations.

Then the fundamentalist Christians raise funds to make donations to their favourite political party. The one that stands for abstinence…

How big do you like your government, baby? I’ll give you a hand out!

On the other hand while I strongly disagree with the “don’t have sex” thing, I think they have a small nugget of wisdom here. I really think that a HUGE reason why the divorce rate is so high is b/c people don’t really have wonderful interpersonal/ relationship skills.

I just hope the program produces some insanely funny “Reefer Madness” level anti-sex ad campaigns.

“Just say no to … life itself!”

So this old lady and her husband were sitting down to dinner, when suddenly the old lady picked up a spoon and smacked her husband on the head.

“Ow! What the hell was that for?!”

“That was for being such a lousy lay!”

The husband thought for a moment, picked up his spoon and smacked her back.

“That’s for knowing the difference!”