Specifically, I had this in mind:
It has always been this: Conservatives believe they have the right to kill everyone else
I can also think of topics that came close, for example:
“Pro-lifers want to control women’s bodies” - Okay, but………why?
which pre-dates the new rules about keeping strict focus. The original question would be ‘what motivation would they have to control women’s bodies’, but the premise was instantly questioned. And I think debate of that premise, whether Pro-lifers have an ulterior motive, is inappropriate for GD. Despite my participation in the thread…
But I can think of tons of topics which don’t necessarily exist, which I would rather not see. I do not endorse any of the viewpoints; to different degrees, they all suffer from the same fatal flaw:
“Transsexual women are really just homosexuals who want to have sex with straight men”
“People who oppose low-income housing are actually racists”
“Women lie about rape to cover up their infidelity”
“People who don’t support advanced interregation techniques are traitors”
“Those who support universal health care hate doctors, like seeing people die from lack of care”
“Environmentalists don’t care about the environment, they just want to rebel against authority”
“Declawing your cat means you are an animal sadist”
“People who say they like Pepsi do so only because they’ve been paid off”
Oh, and I think it’s fine to talk about politics as an ulterior motive in the Politics & Elections forum, for example this topic:
Ex-Republican strategist: Republican Party conservatism was always a lie
~Max