This sounds so much like a typical urban myth I wonder if you have a cite for that?
Not doubting your integrity but I’m curious.
The above claim sounds like it was meant to go in Most Egregious Examples of False Advertising 
Har har har.
Daniel
Meh. Is it all about you?
…Answering - someone, somewhere, gets an up-skirt shot of a woman’s testicles in frilly knickers (*). It astonishes me that anyone would be interested, but I do know there are some that are. For the benefit of the not-yet-orchidected, the thought may be comforting that this couldn’t be very much more anonymous if it tried. Easy for me to say, I know, but surely this doesn’t make much of a ping on the CrossToBearOMeter?
Or not, as the case may be.
Rule of thumb: If your head doesn’t belong there, neither does a camera. If your head wouldn’t be in position to look up a skirt, then don’t put a camera there. Anything that becomes exposed to a casual observer is fair game- but cameras up the skirt is cheating. Classy voyeurs have standards, you know.
[QUOTE=Malacandra]
Never criticize a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes. That way, when you criticize him, you’re a mile away and you’ve got his shoes. QUOTE]
Goddamnit, Malacandra, come back here with my shoes!
Not until you learn to code better.
I stole some running shoes from Jack Handy and now I’ve almost caught up with you!
::He stops to ask a passer-by, “Why is it called tourist season if we can’t shoot at them?”::
Ah, the dear, dead days of the 60s, when skirts had no ‘up’. (They were scarcely wider than belts at one point.)
(Hurries away to, um, reminisce in private.)
Those camera shovers have absolutely no class at all.
There are a lot of ample, legal opportunities to look up, down or straight, and take advantage and enjoy of the view, without the need to shove a camera underneath.
The motto of the voyeur shout be RPRT–right place right time. If you have to make the opportunity, don’t bother.
from Mr. Moto’s Daily Cal link
At risk of a hijack, I must ask if there is any evidence of actual molestation?
This vaguely reminds me of the practice the TV news uses when doing “fat stories” these days. Some network or other did a story about overweight people and included shots of people’s faces. These people noticed they were being called fat on television, sued, and won. So now, for these ever-more-frequent stories, news stations use only shots people’s stomachs generally the body from the waist down, and I think it’s always from the back. Thus the people are not clearly identifiable and the stations are legally protected.
While this is all legal and I guess as ethical as the situation is going to get, if you know what clothes you wore on Thursday and recognize your ass on the news, you probably feel kind of violated by it. The same applies to Malacandra’s quote. Maybe nobody else knows who it is, but if you do, that’s bad enough.
If those harlots are going to go traipsing around without lead-lined underwear on, Superman should not be prosecuted for using his x-ray vision on them.
That’s all I’ll say on the matter.
Wouldn’t this be covered under already-existing privacy laws?
Here you go: towards the end - “The floors were another cause for concern as super shiny tiles turned out to be too reflective with a potential for causing embarrassment to female passengers in skirts.”
There were also several mentions in the South China Morning Post, but that’s a pay site.
Larry? Is that you?
For general amusement, from today’s (London) Daily Telegraph:
“TV PUNDIT WAS PEEPING TOM - A Japanese economist and TV pundit was fined 500,000 yen (£2,500) yesterday for using a mirror to peek under a 15-year-old girl’s skirt and get a look at her underwear on the escalator of a Tokyo train station. Kazuhide Ueskusa, 44, lost his post as a professor at Waseda niversity after the incident in April 2004. - AFP, Tokyo”
And I thought it was compulsory in Japan…
Thank you. Dang, that’s weird.
Extend “Black Friday” to a black upskiirt view every day.
Black undies and a black nylon/rayon skirt liner would result in a pretty dark video!
My guess is that it would become a game to find the good videos.
Several years ago, I worked managing an office building in the Loop. We had escalators to and from the mezzanine level, which had polished chromed railings which angled up and in at foot level. One day, while on the escalator behind a woman, I glanced down and in the rflection caught a PERFECT view of her panty-less reagions. I blinked, made sure I was seeing what I was seeing, caught myself embarassed and turned away. When I got back to my office, i remarked to my colleague what I had seen, clearly also expressing mixed feelings about it. On one hand, hey that was interesting, but on the other hand, oh my GOD, did we know that was possible?
My colleague looked at me like I was an total idiot, and said “Oh you didn’t know You have to be two steps behind on the up escalator and the view is just perfect. Go watch the security people one day and notice how they ‘happen’ to have to use the escalator when an attractive woman in a dress or skirt gets on”.
I was completely creeped out and had a brief, pointed talk with the security contractor. The next year’s capital projects included a rebuild of those escalators and i was able to make sure the foot rails were of a brushed aluminum, much to the dismay of my security staff.