US Constitution 2.0

[QUOTE=Lemur866]
Current constitution is version 2.0. Bill of Rights is Service Pack 1, for version 2.1, and the next 17 patches make us on version 2.1.17.
[/QUOTE]

And yet the thing seems to keep crashing for the current resident of the WH.

[QUOTE=John Mace]
And yet the thing seems to keep crashing for the current resident of the WH.
[/QUOTE]

You misspelled “malware”

You crazy Americans with your fixed constitutions - the UK system of just not having one is far better. What? Electoral dictatorship you say? Get thee gone sir!

[QUOTE=j666]
Section IV of Article II could stand a little clarification. (They include definitions in the CFR.)

(Did I miss an earlier link, or are you all just pretending you know the constitution by heart?)
[/QUOTE]

You don’t have a pocket copy in your briefcase from a visit to the Heritage Foundation?

[QUOTE=Algher]
You don’t have a pocket copy in your briefcase from a visit to the Heritage Foundation?
[/QUOTE]

NRA? Heritage Foundation? What kind of place have I wandered into?

(I have the above link in my Bookmarks)

I am serious about my comment on the constitution:

Article II Section IV
The President, Vice-President and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for and conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

First: is it “other (high crimes and misdemeanors)” or “(other high crimes) and misdemeanors”

Second: what is a high crime or a misdemeanors?

My job involves compliance with federal regulations; the Code of Federal Regulations includes definitions. Why can’t they clarify this section?

We need to clarify grounds for impeachment.

(Don’t get me wrong; I love impeachment hearings. I learn a lot about the Constitution, legal precedent, and congressional rules; a quite a bit of youthful indiscretions. But anything that takes enough time to allow me to starch and iron every piece of plant-fiber cloth in my house, including the table linen - I have lots of table linen - is a waste of tax-payer money.)
Re: guns

Some people say it is an absolute right; some say it is tied to the militia (which was supposed to take the place of a standing army). A constitutional debate will change no-one’s mind.

I live in Massachusetts, I used to have a hell of a temper, and I approve of strict regulation of hand-guns and automatic weapons. I have no problem with guns; I worry about people who own them.

(I own a couple of guns. They’re somewhere in the attic; maybe the basement. I’m not certain where the key to the trigger locks are.)