I am not asking for medical advice; I am asking if I have any real need to see a specialist that I do not think I have a need for.
I’ve lost 70 pounds in 9 months. I plan to lose another 70 to get me down to 125. I have had classes on the evolution of the human diet, and read quite a bit, to get myself nutritionally sound - 15% fat, 15% protein, 70% carbohydrate. (No alcohol.) I just had a physical today and I came out extremely well, with 44/40 good cholesterol, very low bad cholesterol (well under the threshold of normalcy), and significantly under the threshold of cholesterol overall. No other problems.
However, I’m on a restricted calorie diet and only eating around 1250 calories each day. I take a multivitamin (Flintstones chewables = love) each day, along with other foods to pad the lacking minerals and such. I used to have a very, very bad immune system that was hardly functioning; a few months ago, tests put my immune system at perfectly-normal-operation, although a year before that, I was definitely in the bad range. (This bears out in that I caught the flu and hardly noticed it, along with other improvements.) I am seeing that new research lately is saying a restricted calorie diet vastly improves the immune system of mice, gibbons, and now humans, and results in 30-50% extra lifespan for mice, and the same cellular improvements that led to the mice lifespan is seen in humans when this happens. Seems safe, right? I’m benefiting as research says I should, I am not lacking in any nutrients, etc.
Now my GP said he doesn’t think I need to see a nutritionist as my health is so good, and that a nutritionist would probably get upset and want me to take 1600 calories a day at least (he’s apparently worked with several in the area and they were all highly anti-restricted calories). It costs money to find a nutritionist and visit them, assuming any in the area are even in our health care plan. Would it really be worth the time and money to go see one when I have all appearances of being in prime health? I honestly don’t even know what a nutritionist would do for me other than probably spaz at the calories.
My doctor’s a good man, but I have no idea if a nutritionist would have better tests to see about any malnutrition (wouldn’t it have surfaced by now?) or something. I know I can easily just ignore the “EAT MORE FOODS RAGH” advice I might be given. So, would anyone recommend seeing a nutritionist when my GP thinks I am fine with what I am doing?
