I can’t imagine there will be too many more updates to this thread, but I noticed this came out:
It’s… interesting that the takeaway is that the officers should be faulted for not citing Gabby. That might technically be true according to their department’s policies, but then I think that should cause some amount of discomfort in light of what I think we can reasonably infer about the broader dynamics at play in that relationship. Perhaps rather than faulting the officers for not citing Gabby based on her own protestations that she was at fault, the department (and really society in general) should be rethinking what an abusive relationship looks like and how to intervene effectively without contributing to the abuse.