Milk and eggs are naturally produced by wild animals in quantities sufficient for their young/reproductive needs. In order to get the quantities humans want them to produce, birds and mammals are bred into creatures who are in some cases drastically removed from the wild versions, sometimes to such an extent that they can’t survive except in specific human-created conditions; and are often kept in conditions that are nothing like the ones they find in the wild.
I’m an omnivore, and eat lots of things, milk and eggs included; though I try to be careful about how the animals were raised. But the milk and eggs available at the store, or even the ones I sometimes get from the neighbors, aren’t really “naturally shed.”
– Different vegans disagree on a lot of these issues. Some will eat honey, some won’t. I expect some will use naturally shed deer antlers and others won’t. If you want to make a gift for a particular person, I’d advise asking that person.
[whoops, partially ninjad by Ulfreida.]
This is a thread about what vegans think. This snippy argument over an unlikely hypothetical is far too heated for such a simple question that is polling for opinions, and off-topic for the thread anyways. CookingWithGas, stick to the topic of this thread please, and Two Many Cats, dial it way back, or take it to the Pit.
I have heard of vegans who keep “rescued” hens as pets and eat the eggs. I don’t think any vegans drink animal milk, though, because that’s not ever “naturally shed”. (although domestic milk cows that have started producing milk need to be milked or they will die. But maybe there’s not a movement to rescue milk cows while they are in milk.)
Naturally-shed antlers have a distinct “scar” at the end where they fell off the skull. I’d think “harvested” antlers would have to be sawn, and would be obviously different. My guess is that most vegans would place that in the category of “doesn’t really both me, but I don’t want it around my house”.
I take exception to the characterization of my post. I am not trying to have an argument. I was amplifying the point quoted below and certainly not critical of the OP. My post and the post below are directly responsive to why some vegans may not support the use of animal parts of any kind.
Veganism isn’t about perfection, it’s about doing the least harm possible and practical.
I practice veganism and we do buy “shed” antlers for our dogs. The label claims they are naturally found in the woods from wild deer. I don’t know that’s true in all cases; it seems to me that if they move enough product they might need a more reliable source. I also don’t know HOW they are found – for all I know it could be dogs used to sniff them out, or enslaved sweatshop orphans.
Some brands aren’t as specific in their labeling and might be from farmed animals; we try to avoid those.
In the meantime, the ones we do buy appear to be relatively benign and the dogs’ quality of life is improved. If we do learn something that makes buying shed antlers seem inappropriate or harmful, we will reconsider. It’s a moving target as both our understanding and society’s practices evolve.
Generally feather products are not considered vegan, because it’s difficult to imagine a commercial quantity of feathers being available. In certain cases and small quantities, presumably some sort of certification/attestation of sourcing might ameliorate that concern.
However, when we lived with parrots (rescued), I kept shed feathers in a jar and made a craft project out of them – Mardi Gras masks for a party at my work. Some of my co-workers breathlessly asked if we’d pulled the feathers out of our parrots…I’ve never been able to decide whether they were genuinely concerned that we’d harmed our birds (and therefore their concern was touching) or just assumed we were stupid or something (unflattering).
Mightn’t there be a temptation to kill the whales in order to harvest the ambergris? I mean, yes it may wash up on shore, but that’s pretty iffy. Slaughter one whale of the appropriate species, and you’ve got a much higher chance of a payoff.
I worked with a vegan who had a tortoise* shell on her desk, because tortoises were her spirit animal.
Are these shed naturally? I have found them on occasion and I figured the turtle had just died and withered away, leaving the shell.
Anyway. This vegan was also a Reiki master. I’m pretty sure she did not wear leather shoes. But that shell. It was all lacquered too so it wouldn’t shed. I will say she was not fussed about what other people wore or ate. It was a very diverse office and I have never worked anywhere else where there was such a trauma about pizza in the break room, i.e., does it have pork? Does it have dairy? Does it have citrus fruits? How about gluten? The Reiki master didn’t eat any of it. But she ate Jello. And she had that shell, which was a real shell.
The main counterargument I’ve seen is a debate over whether shipping bees around is an exploitative act, or a mutually beneficial one that makes the lives of those bees better. The bees aren’t made to pollinate anything, they’re just shipped to where they have a greater opportunity to do so.
I mean, I know few vegans who think that having pets is immoral. And the reasoning is that it is not exploitation, but a mutually beneficial relationship. (That said, how animals are bred can be immoral, and you shouldn’t support those with inhuman practices. More you should adopt pets.)
There’s also the argument that veganism is about reducing harm in reasonable ways, not being an insane stickler about everything. This is the argument I’ve seen for why bugs accidentally getting trapped when harvesting plants doesn’t mean they can’t eat plants. I could see it also applying here.
On the other hand, there are vegans who decide the most ethical thing they can do is grow their own food, to minimize the problems with industrial foodmaking. That would reduce the accidental killing, and remove the bees who have to be exploited, relying just on the natural pollinator population.
I just asked my daughter this question, who is a vegan, using the deer antler example. She said as long as they were shed naturally and the deer doesn’t need them anymore, no problem. Same for seashells.
I recall an advertisement by some vegans who wanted a lactating human mother to move in and share her leftover breast milk with them. I’m not sure it was real though.
If you’re going by just number of individual products, probably, but the vast majority or our calories do not require bees.
Vegans are not known for their craving for milk that would make them that desperate to get some. Also, leftover breast milk is not a naturally-shed product (unless you bottle some for your kid but he doesn’t finish all of it?)
It is true that some strict Jains, Buddhists, and others will not eat honey because harvesting it could potentially involve hurting bees. I don’t know how widespread this is, but I have encountered it. There is a lot of stuff they won’t eat, eg digging up potatoes or onions is bad; not everything has to be “naturally shed”, but there is a principle of non-violence including towards insects and microorganisms.
Ethically sourced down is naturally shed–is that cool? And where do vegans stand on wool? I mean, sure the critter has to be shorn but that takes about a minute and I’ve seen sheep afterward and I think they’re pretty happy to be shed of that weight of winter wool and if left unshorn it can actually harm them and possibly kill them. Same with alpacas–poor buggers can suffer heat stroke from too much unshorn fleece. How’s that go over with the vegans?
A tree does not naturally shed its trunk, which may be exploited for lumber, clogs, and guitars. Are those verboten? Oh wait, that’s vegetative, not animal. But what, it’s moral for animals to eat people but not vice-versa? Okay, so my old longhair golden retriever Junipero shed fur like crazy. I could have swept all that up and felted it – likely with some of my own fallen hair included. Is it moral to exploit creatures’ sheddings?
True, but to be perfectly fair, once it’s made into a product such as knife handles, walking stick parts, etc, the distinction will no longer be evident without destructive testing of the item.
I used to work with a vegan and we discussed these things on our down time. From what I have been told, honey is bad because bees die when their hives are transported for human use as well as the general exploitation thing. While chickens will lay eggs with or without a rooster around, the eggs are not vegan because of the cruel process of sex sorting the chicks. Around half of the chicks hatched are male. About 1 percent of the males hatched are needed/wanted, the rest are culled (killed).
Okay, so my old longhair golden retriever Junipero shed fur like crazy. I could have swept all that up and