CNN: Venezuela just defaulted, moving deeper into crisis
We’re now a LONG ways (well, four years anyways) from “Hugo Chavez’s economic miracle” that Salon raved about back in 2013.
CNN: Venezuela just defaulted, moving deeper into crisis
We’re now a LONG ways (well, four years anyways) from “Hugo Chavez’s economic miracle” that Salon raved about back in 2013.
Well, our Congresscritters (need I say, Repubs in particular?) will hopefully be watching with rapt attention to the events in Venezuela, and the outcomes, before they try something like that again in this country.
ETA: Okay, I get it. No political jabs in news threads in MPSIMS. But the OP, by his own comment, made clear that he means this to be a political thread rather than (or in addition to) being a news thread.
“Wages of socialism” ?
The American car industry didn’t seem to care much about the wages of socialism when the government bailed their asses out.
Socialism can be applied to different sectors, and can be executed well or executed poorly, depending on the circumstances. Obviously it’s been executed poorly in Venezuela. Socialism has been executed well (for the most part, anyway) in the US military (socialized health care, lots of socialized housing, even socialized dining, etc.) and some other aspects of the US economy and society.
It’s kind of nonsensical to say the military is “socialized”, just given the fact that if we consider it as an economic unit, it is heavily subsidized from the outside. In fact, it is pretty much exclusively funded from the outside. So, if I sent up a “socialized” colony on an island someone and it got a huge infusion of cash every year from the US, would that be a successful application of socialism?
Isn’t the problem more economic mismanagement and the government undermining democracy there?
Had the democratic system worked, the legislature and judiciary could act as a check on Maduro. Instead the legislature is neutered and the judiciary packed with cronies.
No idea what the solution is. I doubt the people can vote their way out of the mess at this point.
Chavez did do some good things at first. Unemployment and poverty dropped. Income went up. Education and health care improved.
Anyway that is why democracy, rule of law and checks and balances are so important. If a government becomes incompetent or corrupt like it has in Venezuela, you can vote them out.
Chavez was basically a thief. He divided the money making businesses among his supporters without a thought about their continued existence and bribed the populace with public money. This wasn’t socialism, but corruption. If you want a better example of socialism, look at Norway.
Venzuelan warns Americans not to let that happen here:
In Venezuela, we couldn’t stop Chávez. Don’t make the same mistakes we did, Andrés Miguel Rondón, Washington Post, January 27, 2017.
Anyone see a military coup happening in the not too distant future?
In my understanding, tons of things that are widely considered socialized (say, police departments, fire departments, schools, etc.) receive “outside” (presumably meaning taxes and the like) funding. If something that receives some sort of outside funding like tax revenue can’t be considered “socialized”, then what would qualify? I’m not sure if I can think of any socialized system not funded in some way by taxes or other outside sources.
Not the Blue Oval.
Norway is largely a free market economy. Sure, they have good welfare programs, but that’s not “socialism.” Cuba is a socialist country.
If we start calling all government spending “socialism” the word will cease to have any sort of useful meaning.
Aren’t the military on the government’s side there? Plus I believe the government has trained and armed pro-government militias.
I don’t want to debate that here for reason you probably understand. I might start a GD thread about it.
This is my understanding too. I think a coup in Venezuela is rather unlikely.
I guess electing a ruthless lying authoritarian narcissistic egomaniac turned out badly for Venezuela. If only there were some lesson we could draw.
See the article linked in Post #9.
But its different, our ruthless, lying, authoritarian, narcissistic egomaniac is politically conservative. Chavez was politically left.
You seem to have confused socialism and communism.