follow up on several threads
http://politics.slate.msn.com/code/PressBox/PressBox.asp?Show=9/7/2000&idMessage=6013
follow up on several threads
http://politics.slate.msn.com/code/PressBox/PressBox.asp?Show=9/7/2000&idMessage=6013
Dammit, Gore should have just chosen Clinton to put him on the ticket and we all could have gotten an answer to this question!
Now we have to wait until at least 2004.
Don’t even joke about that,scares me
to death just thinking about it.
Come on, people! Only the most hardcore Clinton supporters (a very small group, to be sure) would support a Clinton candidacy for VP. The rest of the Democrats can recognize political suicide when they see it.
I don’t care about the politics. I just want someone to settle this answer once and for all, so people will stop posting the question!
according to the 12th Amendment:
“no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be ineligible to that of Vice President of the United States.”
so, relax- there will never be a Vice President William Jefferson Clinton
thank God for small favors
smarty
I have a great deal of respect for the academics cited in the linked article, particulary Professor Amar, who taught me about federal court jurisdiction. However, there is at least one obvious error in the article, which says:
The relevant provision is:
In other words, the statute governing presidential succession does not answer the issue of eligibility to be President, which is governed by the US Constitution. To succeed under the the statute, a office-holder such as the Speaker of the House must be eligible to be President under the terms of the Constitution. So, referring to the statute, as the linked article does, is not an answer to the basic question, which has to be resolved by reference to Article II, the 12th Amendment, and the 22nd Amendment.