Burned Earth tuber dude, I love you wanting to bring information about interesting archeological finds. For the grace of Ghu, the pit burial dated to the 750s … “The mystery is …” dun-dun-dunnnnnnn - But the official start to vikings is Lindisfarne in 793. You freaking muppet [sorry Kermie] They did not teleport from Sweden to Lindisfarne, they did hit other areas before Lindesfarne.
I turned it off … I can not handle that twadlefart.
I’m guessing you are referring to a YouTube video you saw. YouTube content varies from absolute bullshit to high-quality content made by professionals.
It helps if they got the name right - it’s Buried Earth, and they’re clearly ranting about this video about the Salme ship burials. And the actual conclusion of the video seemed to me to be exactly the same as the OP’s point, that the start of the Viking Age wasn’t clear-cut, and there were earlier raids - they just framed it in the typical historytuber clickbaity style first.
Anyhoo, only English archaeology privileges Lindisfarne. Actual Scandanavian archaeology uses a different periodization with way more focus on the 550-800 period being its own thing (Vendel/Merovingian/Late Germanic Iron Age) regardless of whether they were raiding (going viking)
I clicked it off when he made the announcement that Lindisfarne was the beginning of the Viking age I didn’t feel like dealing with the whole twaddle that normally gets passed around and the first 10 minutes was the same crap.
If you want to avoid “crap lack of research just for clicks,” I think you need to be careful which YouTube videos you watch. Some are bullshit, with or without A.I.-generated content.
Here I was thinking it was something about those doofuses in Wisconsin who carved a stone to try to prove Vikings had been there. (never mind that there would have been a chain of settlements and archaelogical evidence between L’ Anse aux Meadows (or wherever) and Wisconsin.