They have blue eyes. How exactly is that different from having blue eyes?
That’s sixteen generations. They have a record of all 65,000 ancestors they would have had back at that time? And of course, 400 years ago is still a century after the conquest.
She doesn’t look anything like a Viking to me. She has high cheekbones and a broad nose.
Nobody keeps “good verbal records.” And because a place is hard to get to today doesn’t mean no Europeans have gotten there for the past 500 years. After all, you got there.
You’ve still provided exactly zero evidence that blue eyes and blond hair predate the Spanish.
Uh-huh. Your cite is a post on the Yahoo Contributors Network. Here are the academic credentials of your authority:
Pretty impressive.
First, it’s a common misconception that Amerindians have only black hair. Many have brown hair, as for example this Embera Indian girl.
Second, many mummies from around the world have reddish hair, regardless of what color they had when they started out. Hair pigments contain eumelanins, which give black/brown/yellow tints, and phaeomelanins, which give reddish tints. Eumelanins are less stable than phaeomelanins and degrade faster. The blackish colors fade, leaving the phaeomelanins which make the hair appear reddish. See for example the mummy of Pharaoh Ramses II.
[QUOTE=LarryM]
Look at the bone structure of the skulls. Do they it look asian like incas or european?
[/QUOTE]
The one you linked to looks clearly like an American Indian to me, due to the high cheekbones. It does not look European. As the Wiki article I linked to above says, Chachapoya remains show Amerindian characteristics like shovel-shaped incisors.
May I ask where you obtained your anthropological training?