Hey, fellow Dopers.
Warning: This is kind of long, but it is relevant.
Any attorneys who are familiar with used car warranties out there? I hope so, becaue I really need your advice. Here’s the situation:
In late April, I bought a 2004 Lincoln Town Car from a dealership (in Philadelphia, PA, in case it matters, and the car was financed). The car came with a 30-day/1,000 mile drivetrain warranty. I began to notice a whining noise whenever I got above 40 mph, and which became louder with increased acceleration. I took it to my mechanic, he drove it around for a few days, and he told me that the problem was the rear differential.
Okay, no problem because I have the warranty, right? Well, not exactly. I took the car to the dealership, and after they drove it around, they told me that the whining was (a) common to Town Cars (and Crown Vics and Grand Marquis), and (b) quite normal and therefore nothing needed to be repaired. I responded by telling the mechanic that I’d driven many, many Fords and Lincolns (including Town Cars) going back almost 20 years, and I’d NEVER heard that whining. (Now, of course, those cars were rental cars and were thus current model years, not nine years old like my baby.) The mechanic kept insisting that this was normal, so I finished with him and went to the dealer’s used car manager, where I politely raised hell. Before long, he said that if I could get a second opinion from another mechanic, they would reconsider their position.
Well, I got opinions not only from a 2nd mechanic (who is a transmission specialist), but also from a Ford dealer, and there opinions were consonant with that of my personal mechanic (who, by the way, is a very good and honest mechanic, and whose word is like gospel to me). (And I had to pay the Ford dealer $50 to investigate and diagnose the problem.)
Okay, so I PDF’d the written diagnoses and sent them to the original dealership. They agreed to pay for the repair, but, apparently not feeling experienced enough to do it themselves (and they certainly didn’t want me going back there), they said that they could (a) send the car out so that someone more experienced could fix it, or (b) cut me a check, provided that I get a couple of estimates. Since I feel that anyone they sent the car to would be tainted by association, I chose the latter option. I got the estimates and sent them off, and the used car manager called me today. I thought that, at the very least, they’d offer to cut me a check for the lowest of the estimates (about $1,400, from the same Ford dealership that confirmed my mechanic’s diagnosis), but they offered to cut me a check for only $1,000. Now, the part at the Ford dealership will cost about $600, and they would charge me $800 in labor. This means that, if I accepted the original dealership’s offer of $1,000, I’d still have to come up with an additional $400 our of my own pocket (again, for a warranty repair).
I asked the used car manager why they were offering only $1,000 and not the $1,400 which represented the lowest estimate, and he replied that they were really obligated to pay for just the parts. Since I’m taking the car on a road trip in a few weeks, and since I want to get this fixed before it becomes a more expensive problem, I told him that I would take the $1,000, which I’m supposed to pick up from them on Thursday afternoon.
Fellow Dopers, was the used car manager lying with respect to their obligations under the warranty if the work is done by someone else (in which case, I’ll reverse course and consult a local attorney), or was he being aboveboard (in which case I’ll take the money and run)?
There are quite a few smart and knowledgeable people on this board, so I’ll certainly look forward to, and most definitely appreciate, any advice that you can give me.
Thank you very much.