Wake up, people! 9/11 really didn’t happen. The Government hired the same company to fake 9/11 that faked the moon landings and faked Elvis Presley’s death.
They stole Harry Potter’s Cloak of Invisibility, then used their secret laboratory to make giant sheets of the stuff that the Cloak of Invisibility is made of. Then they covered the trade center in it, and projected home movies of the disaster on this Wall of Invisibility.
The people and buildings are all still in there, behind the wall. I know this is true, because my cousin’s wife’s uncle is a plummer. The company hired him to build pipes underground that are part of a system to pump Soylent Green into the twin towers so the people behind the Wall of Invisibility don’t starve.
It’s all real simple, when you are lucky enough to have Inside Information.
If you calculate how much money was made with this 9/11 panic… it figures at tens of millions per victim. Would you kill someone to get lets say $50 million ? Many would…
Now lets say they are ideologically driven. By killing 3k americans and then “reforming” the world and driving muslims into submission… they are “saving” the world and fighting Babylon. They are the new saviours of the world.
They knew about the attacks and allowed the attacks to happen… they just didn’t figure more than one plane was involved… oopppss…
CONS:
hhmm… I think destroying one tower would have been enough if they had planned it.
It would be extremely hard to hide this... even with republicans heavily dealing with wanna be snitches. Since no one dissapeared or was killed in suspicious circunstances there seems to be no "evidence" being killed.
I consider Al-Qaeda perfectly capable of pulling off 9/11 by its lonesome. That doesn’t mean that Rove didn’t get in on the act. Here’s the way I see it. Rumsfield and Cheney sit down and discuss with Rove the fact that they need some kind of pretext to invade Iraq. That war plan has been in the books for years, and is a key part of their Mideastern strategy. Rove is their dirty tricks specialist and also their public opinion specialist.
Rove is of the opinion that only something directly affecting Americans on their homeland will do the trick – the attack on the Cole and events in Somalia demonstrate that overseas attacks just don’t get the folks at home mobilised. They talk about playing up the threat of WMDs, but that, too, is seen as not that effective – too much evidence against them, and no evidence that Saddam intends to use them against the U.S.
Then Rove remembers Norquist and his Islamic Institute. He knows that some of the people there are in contact with terrorist groups. He’s been thinking it’s nice to have a back channel to the Islamic terrorists all along, now here’s a chance to use it.
Rove talks to his good buddy Norquist and tells him that America is woefully unprepared for terrorist attacks on their home soil, and maybe it’s better to have small inoculation of terrorism now and prepare for it rather than being overwhelmed by it later on. So the Administration might just miss some warnings about terrorist attacks in the coming months if you know what I mean, and maybe this is something some of Norquist’s friends at the Islamic Institute need to know.
But we are dealing with an administration that deliberately outed a covert CIA operative because they didn’t like her husband’s politics. These people seem fairly reckless with human lives to me.
**and it bugs the shit out of me when easily trashed conspiracy theories like this come out of hte woodwork, so that the usual suspects can
A. Claim that such shit is the mainstream liberal thinking
and
B. get us all to ignore/not notice etc, the very real damage this administration has indeed done. **
[/QUOTE]
I don’t think there’s a lot of credibility left for the conservative commentators in this regard, except for the Billy Joe Buckteeth types who go for junkie hypocrite Rush Limbaugh. Plus, can you imagine the breathless reports from Limbaugh and crew? “Major Democratic activist Evil Captor says that the Bush Administration conspired with the Islamic terrorists to bring 9/11 about! The Democratic Party and liberals everywhere, who hang on Evil Captor’s every word, are even now cranking up the liberal media machine to SMEAR the Bush Administration with these totally unfounded allegations.”
Yah, right. Like I said, only the Billy Joe Buckteeth of the world are gonna buy that stuff …
It seems to me that the conservatives speculate endlessly on talk radio, the Fox Network and so forth about Democratic politicians, is there any reason liberals can’t speculate about Pubbies? Especially with such nice grounds for speculation all laid out before us by the conservative media themselves?
I would argue that the grounds of my speculation is much firmer than the grounds often adopted by Limbaugh, Coulter and crew, hence that their stuff is bullshit, mine is speculation.
Do you argue with any of the premises I use to speculate with? Haven’t seen any counters from you? You seem to be arguing that yeah, point A and point B and point C exist, but you can’t possibly speculate that a point D might exist.
Plus, your average conservative commentator would not have speculated. He or she would have said Rove DID arrange 9/11 on behalf of Bush.
Hmm, seems that the kind of connections listed in the OP - and rightly objected to above - are similar to those that “pin” Al Qaeda to Iraq… or indeed are slightly more than the evidence used to arrest several people under the new antiterrorism powers…
Since my conservative colleagues seem to be utterly unable to make logical arguments when the opportunity for handwaving exists, here are some perfectly good logical counters to my speculation:
Absent any evidence at all that Rove did what is alleged, your speculation is meaningless. Come back when have proof of some kind.
There is nothing in Grover Norquist’s background that indicates that he would be agreeable to conspiring with terrorists. He might have an organization with links to terrorists, but almost anybody who deals with Middle Eastern issues could probably be accused of that.
Any collusion, however subtle, with Islamic terrorists, leaves the Bush Administration too vulnerable to being blackmailed by said terrorists after the fact. The terrorists would have nothing to lose by admitting that they conspired with Norquist and a shadowy administration figure (Rove) to do what is, after all, their business, while the administration would have everything, maybe even their very lives, to lose.
Point 3 to my mind is the strongest logical point against my theory. But I must say, it takes much of the fun out of an argument when your opponents are so feeble that you have to take both sides.