You are confusing sitting down in a restaurant with posting on a message board. The latter is most definitely an invitation to engage in dialogue, while the former isn’t. So your permission is not required, nor is your insistence on it polite.
I have had the incredible luck to have been able to fuck off home early from work this afternoon, which means! I have at hand my copy of Miss Manners’ Guide to Excruciatingly Correct Behavior. (Which, you may note, I have read from cover to cover. Yes, including the index, you cheeky little thing.) I’ve found a passage that I believe is particularly relevant to all of you folks who seem to think that “being polite” requires “saying yes to everybody.”
The OP, was, in essence, invited to join his coworker (after the OP had already started his breakfast). He politely declined. That the coworker didn’t bother to ask and rather assumed that he was welcome was the fault of the coworker, and if he was embarrassed because he joined the table before being sure of his welcome and thus was put in the position of conducting his meal in silence, that was his own fault.
Hey now, don’t mock Anne McCaffrey. I thought she was the greatest thing ever… from the ages of seven to fourteen or so.
Miss Manners would explicitly disagree with you. This is precisely her advice for dealing with rude questions such as, “What’s wrong with your tarded baby?” It’s polite, because you’re assuming that the person could not possibly have had such poor taste as to ask such a question, so you must have misheard them.
And again, this is not *my *book–it’s Miss Manners’.
All that means is that Miss Manners is a jerk. I don’t know why people seem to think she’s so great if she thinks she has the right to try to passive-aggressively force people to follow the rules that she herself made up. She’s right about how to handle the conversation, but if your intent is to hurt the other person, rather than just communicate that you don’t want to talk, then you are a jerk.
It’s really simple here–you have to pay attention to what you are communicating. If you noticed the guy was uncomfortable, you had the choice of being nice and helping, or being a jerk and not. That’s it.
People whine about us saying that his right is higher than the OP’s. but the OP is just doing the exact opposite, saying his time is worth more than the other guy’s. Sure, his right to conversation doesn’t override your right to read. But your right to read doesnt’ override his right to conversation.
It’s this stupid black-and-white thinking that drives me crazy. This is a false dichotomy. There are plenty of ways to have kept on reading while giving the most basic level of conversations. The fact that you noticed that it bothered him was enough for you to know you were hurting him, and to offer the basic level of help.
Again, if you know something bad is happening, and do not even do the most basic things to stop it, then you are responsible.
This is easily the longest thread I have ever started. I’m off to breakfast with my colleagues so this will be short. I think some of the posters ‘outraged’ over my action have behaved much more rudely in this thread than what I did at breakfast and I think some people have not nearly as upset as they claim on this board.
hmmmmm
were i asking to join a slight acquaintance, I would say “May I sit with you?” and follow it with “Please don’t let me distract you from your reading time…” but I am a Big Book Junkie