Thank you. Reminds me of my late (and quite mentally ill) grandmother. Poor thing. I hope she gets some help.
Wait! Just one more que . . .
Actually, the fact that he declared during the annulment proceedings that he had never intended to remain faithful to his spouse would have had a much bigger impact on the church decision to grant the annulment than any family connections. Such “connections” play no part in the typical bureaucracy involved in the church courts, which are pretty much independent, and his open support for Roe v Wade and other issues would have negated any such connections, anyway–particularly since, by the time of the annulment, he was the effective paterfamilias with no family member having more power to look out for him.
(Those that need to see favoritism and corruption in anything and everything connected with the RCC or the Kennedys are liable to prefer to believe that something underhanded happened, but there is no evidence of it and no need to suppose it.)