Here’s the (IMHO, stupid) controversy:
So childhood obesity is one of her First Lady “causes,” and while I’m against the Nanny State, it’s a huge (get it?) and growing (?) problem that, especially as the Nanny State gets more involved in healthcare, costs us all a lot in money and other pathologies. As First Lady causes go, no worse than literacy or whatever.
Now she’s taking heat for trying to illustrate/personalize her story by relating the supposed fact that Sasha and Malia were, by inference, eating a little too junky and heading down the road to unhealthy weight gain. So, she continues, she made some small changes (I doubt they were caloric limits per se, maybe more like eliminating juice, soda, snack foods, having them play outside more, etc.). A true-life inspiration for moms everywhere.
I have no problem with this (unless it’s made up, and not even then, except for the slander to the girls).
But we get quote after quote from “Laura Collins Lyster-Mensh, an eating disorder activist and executive director of Families Empowered and Supporting Treatment of Disorder (F.E.A.S.T.)” and others about how dangerous it is to teach children to focus on their weight.
I call BS. The perils and cost of obesity are real, and while it’s not evil to be fat, it’s not a bad thing to convey a message that it is something to be avoided if at all possible. The real-world cost of obesity dwarf those of the (unfortunate but relatively minute) small number of people who suffer ill effects from serious not-eating-enough disorders or " body image" problems.
Anyone agree with me that Michelle didn’t do anything wrong and that it’s time to stop worrying so much about the myth of girls starving themselves on a widespread basis? The evidence of my eyes tells me that the BBW is a far bigger (heh) pandemic health problem than the Karen Carpenter Story. Yes, yes, we can aim to avoid either extreme, and should, but the flak Mrs. Obama’s taking seems ridiculous.