Who the hell is reviving threads that are 6 months old?
Esprix
Who the hell is reviving threads that are 6 months old?
Esprix
Esprix: In your best Church Lady voice “Could it be . . . Satan?!”
Couldn’t resist. I don’t know about any 6 month old posts, just this one.
Lucifer being the Latin word, just kind of stuck in all the translations. I don’t know if it’s because the literal translation is day star, the same nomenclature used for Jesus in Revelation (22:16). If, as some have supposed, the early NT writers were using the Septugant (sp?), then the literal translation may have slipped by them. Oops! Same problem with the virgin birth translation dilemma. But the Isaiah refernce is seen as refering to the Babylonian king in Judaism, and Christianity puts it into a dual meaning of the king and the fall of Satan. Why is beyond me, maybe because of the poetic nature of the verses in Isaiah.
A good explanation that I’ve found for the Judaic belief of who Satan is can be found at http://www.outreachjudaism.com/satan.html Here is a snipet from the site, the whole topic is more lengthy.
At least that is the good rabbi’s take on things.
That was one of my problem’s with Christian theology. If Satan is the source of evil, the fallen angel, and God can not have sin in his presence under any circumstances, than what was Satan doing up in heaven talking with God in the book of Job.
The last post in this thread was 12/22/99, until foolsguinea revived it.
Anybody know why?
Esprix
Some of us may have not been here that long, or may have not read it, or have problems with short term memory. Or, in my case, all three
Can you post the link? I know I’d be interested in reading it.
I had read that the ‘reformed Egyptian’ on the plates Joseph Smith found was actually variations on Roman letters and Arabic numbers, turned upside down, mirror images, etc., and had nothing to do with any Egyptian language.
Wasn’t there something about magic golden spectacles that were provide to read it with? Weird stuff.
I’m surprised the Book of Mormon has held up as long as it has, with all the historical inaccuracies in it, i.e. elephants and sheep in the pre-Columbian Americas…