For those who don’t know, in the movie My Cousin Vinny, two New yorkers get arrested in Alabama for murdering a clerk. When the very amateurish family lawyer Vincent LaGuardia “Vinny” Gambini (played by Joe Pesci) comes to defend them, hilarity ensues.
(For those who maybe haven’t seen this movie, even though it is over two decades old, please consider this a spoiler alert.)
The trial culminates in Vinny putting his own girlfriend on the stand as an expert witness. The following exchange occurs over the tire tracks that were left behind at the scene which was the incriminating evidence against the two:
After this testimony, the FBI witness for the prosecution agrees with all of this, the local sheriff, who has run a records check at Vinny’s request, testifies that two men resembling Billy and Stan were arrested a few days earlier in Georgia for driving a stolen Pontiac Tempest, a car very similar in appearance and color to Billy’s Buick Skylark, and in possession of a gun of the same caliber used to kill the clerk.
What I want to know is is this accurate? Do the facts line up with the history and could that history have been used to make the determination that Mona Lisa did in court?