Step one; enforce the laws already on the books, DO NOT draft new ones simply to make it look like you’re “doing something proactive”, strict penalties for anyone that uses a firearm in a crime, don’t want a free trip to the Straight-Bar-Motel courtesy of the state, then don’t commit crimes, simple, eh?
Step Two; see step one
the only “common sense” gun restrictions I could see a need for is for convicted felons to not be able to own/use firearms, don’t want to lose your 2nd amendment rights? DON’T COMMIT CRIMES!
Assault Weapon Ban? ditch it, it’s useless and meaningless, it only bans “scary looking” guns, an Armalite AR-15 shoots the same cartridge and has the same Semiautomatic (one shot per trigger pull, and reloads itself after a round is fired, but does not continuously spray bullets as long as the trigger is held back, one shot per pull only) action as a Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle, a “normal” hunting rifle
Limit on magazine capacity? NO! the amount of rounds per magazine makes no difference, if a criminal wants to go on a shooting spree, they can easily carry multiple magazines, the average reload time for a semiauto firearm is a few seconds, drop the empty mag out of the gun, slap in a new mag, cycle the action to load
these are nothing more than busybody-feel-good legislations which have no impact on firearm crime, if Greg Gangbanger wants to expend thirty rounds of 9mm in a driveby, having three ten-round mags is not going to be a major handicap, and when Greg Gangbanger is caught by the police, he should be rightly put away for a very long time, if anyone is killed in said drive-by, automatic life imprisonment, no possibility of parole, no appeals, nothing, lock him up, and throw away the key