Why should I accept your opinion?
Are you disputing the companies and figures they list or are you burying your head in the sand?
Can you prove them wrong?
It’s up not to me to prove them wrong. It’s up to you to prove them right.
I like chocolate chip cookies.
The money in my wallet says: “Legal tender, for all debts public and private”. Any place that won’t take my money can eat my shorts.
Well, I tried to help you.
“I want cites, but I won’t accept your cites!”
Those “Obamaphones” should really be called “Reaganphones”, because the Lifeline program was created in 1984, to provide low-cost or free landlines, with the emphasis being on senior citizens and the rural poor.
What, you expect him to sully himself by giving traffic to the likes of those leftist websites? Unpack this sites’ sources for him, or they have no validity!
Over the years, I worked with several pharmacists who treated Medicaid patients poorly, no matter why they were on it. :mad: I did not allow that behavior (making them wait extra time after the prescription was filled, partially filling it so they would have to make another trip back even though we had enough to send them on their way with a completed prescription, etc.) when I was there, and I also told them, “How do you know you’ll never need it?”
The first time I encountered this, he admitted that he didn’t have health insurance even though it cost $10 a week for a single person (ETA in the mid 1990s).
:eek: He said, “I’m healthy. I don’t need it.” Yeah, healthy people get hit by cars, get cancer, etc., you doofus.
My rental office does not take cash for rent, although they do for laundry chip cards, for this exact reason.
You claimed them to be unusable. It’s up to you to support that claim.
What a fucking weasel and moron you are. The articles are full of facts and figures. Are you disputing that the corporations are receiving those amounts?
You could consider that I might be onto something in post 88.
common dreams dot org IS NOT A CITE. Certainly not on a board that’s allegedly dedicated to fighting ignorance.
As has been pointed out before, if you pay for goods and services at the time you receive them, it’s not a debt.
I see the OP is too embarrassed to have returned to the thread they started.
May we presume your position to be that any assertion made on that site, regardless of how much or how well it is sourced and cited is subject to gratuitous dismissal?
It’s not well sourced.
Would you accept a cite from FoxNews?
If I learned that a citation I found to be reliable had happened to have been used by FOX News, that knowledge would not make me mistrust the citation.
The likelihood that my first encounter with the citation would be through FOX News is nil, of course.
Could you share why you are not inclined to consider the data from Good Jobs First to be well-sourced?
I’m not inclined to accept common dreams dot org as a cite.