Well, I've Gone and Done It

Do you have at least a rudimentary grasp of Java, JavaScript, PHP, and Flash? It does not matter if you’re offering “basic, bare-bones” web services; you absolutely need to know these tools in order to be competitive with anyone. My suggestion is that you at least take a course or two in web design to get yourself up to speed on the current standards. You’ll also need to break into graphic design with tools like Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator – if you have “a guy that does graphics,” he’s either going to start demanding a decent salary (eating up your profits) or he’ll end up not putting a lot of effort into your business since he’s not getting paid enough to care.

The reason the high-profile websites have those browser-choking JavaScript widgets is because they’re gathering information from every user who visits their site (and probably depositing a cookie or two in your computer, too). This information is very valuable to their marketing departments.

Someone in this thread suggested that you work on an option-based pricing schedule, and I think this is an excellent idea. Your basic, bare-bones, you-get-what-you-pay-for website will be your base fee, then you show your clients a list of options that would tailor the site to them. Want information-gathering scripts? Tack on $150. Want dynamic Flash-based graphics? $200. And so on. You get the idea.

One more suggestion: Design a few sites for fake companies you’ve made up. It’s not completely honest, but it’ll show prospective customers that you have an established clientele and that you’re not some fly-by-night operation. Appearance is 90% of business.

Good luck with your first customer.

Congratulations on your first client! May they be the first of many! :slight_smile:

I’m not sure why people think ‘slick’ is a pejorative term for webdesign - websites need to be superficially good looking to be respected these days. I’m not saying content is unimportant, but that looks are pretty darn important too as that first impression counts for a lot in the fickle world of websurfing. Also, ‘slick’ and ‘simple’ are not mutually exclusive terms.

May I make a few suggestions about your own website, Eutychus? I’m not even remotely a design professional, so wiser people should go right ahead and put me in my place.

(1) The banner on top might be too large. It currently seems to occupy about a quarter of the height of my browsing area.
(2) The buttons are a rather violent shade of blue and stand out discordantly from the muted tones of the rest of the page. Similarly, the shading in the buttons (dark border fading to lighter body) doesn’t seem to be reflected elsewhere in the website’s theme and jars the eye a bit.
(3) Upon mouseover, the text in your buttons turns red. Again, the lack of red elsewhere makes this just a little startling.

You know what, I think it’s the buttons that might be bugging Rigamarole. Just realised my points (2) and (3) are both about those buttons. What do the rest of you think?

And the last thing I noticed…

(4) The bottom white text box on your homepage is kind of oddly sized…bigger than the main blue text box, but not reaching the leftmost margin either.

Not sure how you feel about any of these things, but just an FYI. Good luck with this endeavour!


Firefox 3.0.12/Vista/1680x1050