We'll need a forum for crappy parents

DOPER:
Any False Dilemma, Slippery Slope, Complex Question, Appeal to Force, Appeal to Pity, Prejudicial Language, Popularity, Changing the Subject?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Argument from Ignorance, perhaps?
VENDOR:
Ah! We have From Ignorance, yes sir.
DOPER:
You do! Excellent.
VENDOR:
Yes, sir. It’s, ah … it’s a bit runny.
DOPER:
Oh, I like it runny.
VENDOR:
Well, it’s very runny, actually, sir.
DOPER:
No matter. Fetch hither le ignorance de la Belle France! M-mmm!
VENDOR:
I think it’s a bit runnier than you’ll like it, sir.
DOPER:
I don’t care how fucking runny it is. Hand it over with all speed.
VENDOR:
Oh …
DOPER:
What now?
VENDOR:
Schrodinger’s cat ate it!
DOPER:
Has he?
VENDOR:
She, sir.

(pause)
DOPER:
Circular Definition?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Appeal to Authority?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Anonymous Authority?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Style Over Substance?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Hasty Generalization?
VENDOR:
No, sir.
DOPER:
You do have some fallacies, do you?
VENDOR:
Of course, sir. It’s a logical shop, sir. We’ve got …
DOPER:
No, no, don’t tell me. I’m keen to guess.
VENDOR:
Fair enough.
DOPER:
Er, Straw Man?
VENDOR:
Yes?
DOPER:
Ah, well, I’ll have some of that.
VENDOR:
Oh, I thought you were talking to me, sir. Mr Straw, that’s my name.

(pause)
DOPER:
Unrepresentative Sample?
VENDOR:
Ah, not as such.
DOPER:
Er, Joint effect?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Slothful Induction?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Fallacy of Exclusion?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Accident?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Post Hoc?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Non Sequitur?
VENDOR:
No.
DOPER:
Denying the Antecedent?.
VENDOR:
Not today, sir, no.

(pause)
DOPER:
Ah, how about Ad hominem?
VENDOR:
Well, we don’t get much call for it around here, sir.
DOPER:
Not much ca- It’s the single most popular fallacy in the world!
VENDOR:
Not round here, sir.
DOPER:
And what is the most popular fallacy round here?
VENDOR:
False Analogy, sir.
DOPER:
Is it.
VENDOR:
Oh yes, sir. It’s staggeringly popular in this manor, squire.
DOPER:
Is it.
VENDOR:
It’s our number-one best seller, sir.
DOPER:
I see. Ah, False Analogy, eh?
VENDOR:
Right, sir.
DOPER:
All right. Okay. Have you got any, he asked expecting the answer no?
VENDOR:
I’ll have a look, sir … nnnnnnooooooooo.
DOPER:
It’s not much of a logical shop, is it?
VENDOR:
Finest in the district, sir.

Just like nobody expects the Spainish Inquistition.

Or a 1920’s style “Death Ray.”

Rasputin? Is that you?

I never wanted to be in such a trainwreck of a thread. I always wanted to be…

…a lumberjack! Leaping from tree to tree…as they float down the mighty rivers of British Columbia! The larch…the redwood…the mighty sequoia…with my best girl by my side! The giant deadwood, the spruce…the little Californian root tree! We’d sing, sing, sing!

[singing; key of: ‘Off’]

…I’m a lumberjack, and I’m okay.
I sleep all night. I work all day…

[/singing]

Good one, GIGObuster. I like.

It was a pun.

A pun?

Well, this has degenerated into…I’m not sure what it’s devolved to but it sure ain’t the rant/discussion intended. A joke/pun shoot-out maybe.
Closed at the request of the OP.

TVeblen
Pit mod