Whack-a-Mole did something really stupid

[Bricker]

@Contrapuntal

@Bricker

Now comes The Second Stone who says that DeLay must be gulty because I’m defending him, and as I admitted in another thread, I never had a client I thought was completely innocent.

I point out that the two situations are completely different: I was talking about my time as a public defender. The Second Stone’s response? The message board is a public forum, and you are defending DeLay, so that’s being a public defender.

Please tell me he didn’t say that.

Sorry. From the GD thread:

@Bricker

I said that as a public defender, I believed I never had an innocent client. There is absolutely nothing to allow you to infer that because it was true of my long-ago career as a PD, it’s also true of anyone I choose to defend in argument here.

@The_Second_Stone

Well, now you are splitting hairs. This is a public forum, he is accused of of a crime, you are defending him. You have never publicly defended someone who is factually innocent. Therefore, he is guilty.