Well, now you are splitting hairs. This is a public forum, he is accused of of a crime, you are defending him. You have never publicly defended someone who is factually innocent. Therefore, he is guilty.
You might want to assert your genuine belief that he is factually innocent, but that would be misconduct, now wouldn’t it?
The fact is that until such a time as there is a conviction, he is presumed innocent of criminal wrongdoing. None of us here who do not have access to all the files, statements, etc. is particularly qualified to assert otherwise.