I know we have Watergate and “Spotlight” where the media has done some amazing things in the past, but what are some other cases? What are other instances where journalists solved mysteries or made discoveries?
I like the idea of having positive examples of the news.
There’s always Glenn Greenwald, who probably doesn’t get enough credit for publicizing domestic surveillance because he keeps saying crazy things.
The AP largely broke the Abu Ghraib scandal, though Amnesty International mostly beat them to it.
Yahoo! Sports initially reported on the Reggie Bush benefits scandal which led to him being stripped of the Heisman and NCAA sanctions against Southern Cal.
A variation on this situation that is very common is when a journalist(s) “gets behind” a defense attorney to make public a questionable prosecution or conviction. Prosecutors, who are frequently elected officials, don’t like the spotlight if it makes them look bad. This has been critical in getting many convictions overturned or getting cases dropped.
I would also add a list of past Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, which is awarded to stories that do the public a great service. It’s also the highest journalism prize in the industry. These, according to the Pulitzer Board, were the most important stories of the year.
If you hear someone talk about the media, especially those in the United States, as the “enemy of the people,” present this list.
If you look through this thread and eliminate the movies and TV shows that aren’t based on true events, you get a starting list of cases where journalists broke important stories:
It wasn’t a huge one in terms of time or resources, but back when cellphones were new and only rich people had them, Spain’s Traffic policemen were very keen on banning their use while driving. Politicians (a group likely to have cellphones, at the time) didn’t see what the problem was - until the signal from one of them was intercepted by some reporters during a conversation in which he called many of his colleagues (mainly from his own party) by very unflattering nicknames.
That wasn’t any kind of crime, or felony, or whatever beyond a faux pas, except the cops got a recording off a TV broadcast of the tape and used this recording to get a judge’s permission to gain access to the original tapes. Which they then analyzed for Doppler effect, slamming the politician with what at that point was one of the highest speeding tickets on record.
Amazingly enough, Parliament passed a law banning cellphone use while driving as quickly as they were able to write it.
Let’s also not forget The New York Times’ and The New Yorker’s inveestigations into Harvey Weinstein and all the horrible things he did to women. Not only did their stories reveal the uglier side of the male-dominated industry that is Hollywood, but it unleashed a domino effect that sprung the #MeToo movement.
There’s also The Intercept (co-founded by Greenwald), but that’s way more leftist. Mostly still investigative and original research, though.
In truth, Trump pretty much singlehandedly revived the investigative journalism niche; it was a nearly dead before that as the center-left got comfortable with Obama and the right devolved into lunacy and alternative realities.
Within the past few years, WSJ investigated blood testing company Theranos and published a series on them. Led by John Carreyrou IIRC, who also wrote a book.
The Daily Telegraph broke the MP’s expenses scandal.
But it can go wrong. The BBC covered the police searching Cliff Richard’s home. The paedophile claims of ‘Nick’ were promoted and sold by Exaro. ‘Nick’ has now been charged.
The Washington Post investigated and broke the story about Roy Moore having a history of sexually abusing children. I believe (not sure if this is true) it all started when a reporter overheard some women talking about Moores past at a rally.