[QUOTE=tomndebb]
So any discussion of “white” or “black” culture has to identify, (in some ways artifcially), ways that the very large number of white (sub)cultures are more like each other and less like the several distinct black (sub)cultures–with the potential risk of misidentifying a geographic culture as one identified by race when the reality is that it only happens that the person doing the sorting happens to know only people of a particular race by their geography.
[/QUOTE]
In the discussion that gave rise to this one, the subject was specifically about movie-going behavior. I offered that blacks and whites, as groups, have different preferences when it comes to watching movies. Cultural factors I suspect are largely at play.
When making this statement, I fail to see why it is necessary to talk about subcultures and sub-subcultures and point out the various ways in which white people are more alike each other and less like the black subcultures. Not only does this add a whole bunch of extra information that doesn’t really advance the discussion, but it needlessly complicates the basics of the idea being communicated. Generalizations are applied all the time to people, whether it be in regards to nationality, religion, class, or some other thing. Is ethnicity really all that different?
As a middle-class black person who was born and raised in integrated environments in the South, I’ve been around enough white and black people of various SES strata to know that while there are not vast chasms of dissimilarity separating the two groups, there are differences that are appreciable. Different ways of speaking, styles of self-expression, tastes in clothes, forms of celebration, food, names, art and music appreciation…a lot of things.
Sure, some of these observations may be confounded by class and regional derivation, but many are not. Religious customs are a good example. Christianity is prevalent among both whites and blacks, but a service at a black church generally speaking is not the same experience as a white one. Anyone who says otherwise is probably not qualified to speak on the subject.
There may not be some overarching commonality that puts whites uniformly in one pile and blacks in another. But I don’t think that means we can’t recognize and talk about the ways in which blacks (as a group) differ from what is commonly called the “mainstream”.
I think of it this way: African-Americans spent centuries in this country socially marginalized from the mainstream, isolated with only each other to turn to, with only bits and pieces from lost tribes and families to remind them of their pre-American past. It would have been impossible for them to have walked away from that isolation without having some kind of distinct cultural package Perhaps a hundred years from now, assimilation will have made these differences neglible, but not enough time has past for that to be the case now.