What are the problems with biofuels

I suspect you may be conflating two things here; in general places where oil is are not geo-thermally active, for obvious reasons. If you see the two articles I links a few posts ago, you have to drill down a long way (~4km) to get to hot rocks (except the huge one found in South Australia recently, that’s unusually shallow), deeper than most oil wells. Most of the cost is in the drilling.

DEAR GOD…NO!!! :eek: :eek: :frowning:

:smiley:

I can’t post on it because I’ve signed an NDA, but my company is right now designing an ethanol production plant which appears to be substantially energy positive. However, the capital cost does not appear to me that it will have a payback any time soon unless gasoline stays near $4 a gallon or higher. Nonetheless, it’s serious enough that folks are thinking to break ground in less than 3 months.

When I was in Europe last week, I met with a large company which is betting the farm on biodiesel production from rapeseed, and their calculations are showing a very large net energy production from the process. Thanks to the regulatory environment they’re in, they feel like they themselves can eventually supply 15% of their entire country’s motor fuel, although they will need to import rapeseed from other countries, such as the US…and if the US is busy making its own biodiesel, then it may be a case of too much demand for too little raw material. I wasn’t there to talk about biofuels, so I didn’t get any details of their process, although I did get to tour their laboratory and see and smell biodiesel in different levels of production. No souvenirs, though. Damn.

But to say Chernobyl will never happen again is not to say a nuclear accident can never happen again.

sorry the greens would never let you use geothermal as the earths core is heated by nuclear energy. :slight_smile:

I’ve heard that soybeans give a much greater return than corn in terms of bio-diesal (or ethanol. Damn memory).