I ask this partly because I was reading old threads and was amused at how some early predictions haven’t really panned out. cough cough Texas Rangers cough cough
My beloved Seattle Mariners are currently 31 and 9. In the first 40 games, that’s over .750 ball. Much has been made of this; although they were expected to be a reasonably good team, most of the commentators I saw were picking Oakland to take the division, and certainly nobody expected the Mariners to rack up one of the dozen best starts in major league history.
Let me be clear, though, this is not a gloating thread. It’s way too early for even the most optimistic fan to start getting up some serious hopes. With three quarters of the season yet to come, there’s still plenty of time to choke. (Ask a Boston fan.)
Still, it seems evident that the M’s are doing something right, or they wouldn’t have won all but one of their series (a homestand against Toronto; I was there for the bitter disappointment of game three). So, out of curiosity, I thought I should ask the SDMB’s baseball fans for their thoughts on the subject. I’ll reserve my own opinions for now, so as not to bias the discussion. I’d especially like to hear from non-Mariners fans, people who have watched their teams play against the M’s, to hear their perspective, though of course M’s fans are welcome (as long as you stick to the no-gloating guideline, please).
So:[ul][li]What are the Mariners doing right? Hitting, pitching, ephemera like management style or playing philosophy, whatever? Which aspect is most important?[/li]
[li]Which players, in particular, have proved most valuable so far? Or to look at it another way, who can the team not afford to lose?[/li]
[li]Where are the Mariners weak? Other than the obvious, what’s got the most potential to bite them in the long run? And how would you shore up this element (add a player, or whatever) without damaging the current team’s chemistry?[/li]
What are the odds of this success being sustained through the season? Obviously, part of the magic of the game is how the short term gets ironed out by the long term, so how much of their success so far can be attributed to luck or statistical anomalies, and how much to good baseball?[/ul]I look forward to any and all thoughts.