I find it easiest to give up elephant hunting each year for Lent.
But body and soul are one and the material and physical is entwined with the soul. Giving something up to remind yourself of the sacrifices made by Christ isn’t a game. Because neither is rejoicing with Easter, which is for a limited time too.
I’m not a Christian but a CofE primary school and English society in general inscribed the Lent tradition into me.
If it makes some of the more serious posters feel better I try and turn the negative into a positive, like giving money saved via abstinence to charity.
I have no inspiration at the moment though.
Getting back to the OP, I’m trying the “no-alcohol” this year.
I’m giving up for Lent.
It’s an acquired taste, as one you’ll find in Shakespeare. I like the Old Testament and personally find it to be interesting, but often overly repetitive and pedantic. That new translation really bugs me, though.
I find it very unusual that anyone using the term “kumbaya” sardonically is struggling with the King James version. This is an extreme cognitive disconnect.
Consider me even more cognitively disconnected now.
A Baptist celebrating Lent? That sounds…almost…like…a sin to me. As I’ve said strongly before in this thread, I don’t think lent is about identifying with the Christ or his suffering. It’s about recognizing one’s own corporal humanity. In fact, it’s the opposite of identifying about the Christ. It’s about recognizing that you ARE NOT THE CHRIST. “Vanity of vanities…”
I find this to be both provocatively eloquent and something which causes me to think deeply as a Catholic. Thank you.