As it happens, I’ve just received my tax statement: here in the UK, ‘Health’ - which includes the NHS - is 20% of my tax; ‘Welfare’ is the biggest element at 24%.
Excluding the VAT is misleading because that is what separates the US tax system from most of Europe. The US collects 49% of its taxes on profits and income. The OECD average is 34%, the US trails only NZ, Australia, and Denmark and none of those countries collect a separate social security tax. The US only collects 17% of total taxes as sales tax which is almost half the OECD average of 32%. Thus if you only compare income taxes that is the area the US taxes the heaviest while leaving out the type of tax that America taxes the least.
According to the OECD report Growing Unequal the US has the most progressive tax system in the world among rich countries. In 2005 the US collected 45% of taxes from the top 10% of earners. The OECD average was 31.6%. Ireland was second with 39.1%. The ratio of taxes paid to market income was also highest in the US with 1.35 compared to the average of 1.11. Note that this does not include VAT or sales tax, so just the income tax system.
South Africa does has the most progressive tax system in the world but is not included in most lists because it is not considered a rich country. South Africa is the world’s most unequal in terms of income so that is probably why it is so progressive in collecting taxes.
Since it is so hard to compare tax systems because of the different layers of government and the different types of taxes the easiest way is to look at taxes as a percentage of GDP. The percentage for the US is 26 and the percentage for Norway is 54% so Norway pays a little over twice as much in taxes as the US.
That does not make it misleading.It is about comparing taxes, and you can get all that just by looking up PPP comparisons. Gas taxes, VAT, road taxes etc all get rolled up into purchasing power adjustments.
Yes, it is the area that the US taxes the least, but that is part of the reason why the US has a lower cost of living. I suppose I should have specified personal taxes.
But it’d be much more complicated to include all those surcharges. VAT varies by how much of your income goes to necessities and by location.
No, that really is misleading because we are looking at the tax burden on individuals here. Taxes as a percentage of GDP is affected by how the tax burden is allocated between individuals and businesses, how many loopholes there are (i.e. what taxes are actually paid by businesses) and what percentage of the population is working. Or how many backs share the tax burden on individuals.
If my paycheck goes down 15% because of a tax increase or everything I buy goes up in price 15% because of a VAT, then in both cases my standard of living has stayed the same.
Taxes fall on people, not businesses either through reduced income for the owners or higher prices for the customers. Either way, it is people who pay the taxes.
In Canada, people pay taxes individually, not as a married couple (though they can share some tax credits). But in the US there are different options. For some countries we would need to know what Harriet’s spouse’s income is. (And do we need to deal with the potential of being common-law instead?)
#2 can take advantage of the student loan interest tax credit. It’s not much, but better than nothing.